2019
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-019-01382-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The recurrence rate after penicillin administration was lower than that after the administration of macrolides, quinolones, and aminoglycosides. The reason for this difference may be that most of the pathogens that cause erysipelas were more sensitive to penicillin and that the clearance rate of penicillin was higher; hence, the clinical effect was better [12]. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in the incidence of cardio-cerebral-vascular diseases, lung diseases, and liver and kidney diseases between the two groups; this finding suggested that these factors were not directly related to the recurrence of erysipelas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recurrence rate after penicillin administration was lower than that after the administration of macrolides, quinolones, and aminoglycosides. The reason for this difference may be that most of the pathogens that cause erysipelas were more sensitive to penicillin and that the clearance rate of penicillin was higher; hence, the clinical effect was better [12]. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in the incidence of cardio-cerebral-vascular diseases, lung diseases, and liver and kidney diseases between the two groups; this finding suggested that these factors were not directly related to the recurrence of erysipelas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Second, the C-reactive protein (CRP) level and peripheral blood white blood cell (WBC) count were not investigated. This is because only one previous study showed differences in CRP and WBC between patients with erysipelas and those with recurrent erysipelas [18], but other studies showed no such differences [12,19]. In addition, a new study has elaborated the usefulness of CRP and differential (neutrophil) blood count for differentiating between erysipelas and S.aureus-mediated cellulitis [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierbei ist stark umstritten, ob in diesen Fällen Staphylococcus aureus tatsächlich als ursächlicher Erreger angesehen werdenkann [7]. EinErysipel beiNeugeborenen ist oft auf Gruppe-B-Streptokokken (Streptococcus agalactiae) zurückzuführen, welche ebenfalls für viele perianale und -vaginale Erysipele insbesondere bei Schwangeren ursächlich sind [8].…”
Section: » Ein Nachweis Des Erregers Gelingt Seltenunclassified
“… 1 , 2 GAS causes 5% to 10% of pharyngotonsillitis cases in adults and up to 37% in children older than 5 years; it also causes cutaneous infections. 3 , 4 GAS can lead to invasive infections such as bacteremia, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, mastoiditis, and necrotizing fasciitis. The incidence of invasive GAS infection in developed countries is 2.3 to 6.2/100 000 and the fatality rate for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome is 30% to 60%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%