2019
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2019.1573981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is coopetitive decision-making a black box? Technology and digitisation as decision-makers and drivers of coopetition

Abstract: Coopetition-simultaneous cooperation-and competition are increasingly becoming popular approaches in business studies. However, coopetition discussions dominate the content of decision-making about coopetition activities. The decision-maker can be a black box, firm, or organization, which optimizes its decisions in the prevailing business environment. The role of technology in decision-making has also passed. Because of developing decision-support systems, it is crucial to understand who makes decisions about … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the technological innovation paradigm of enterprises is threatened by the external environment. Although enterprises can respond to technological iterations and establish a new knowledge base by investing more resources and costs, this will greatly increase entrepreneurial risks, especially for new enterprises, which cannot maintain high investment in technology R&D for a long time [ 51 ]. However, if the new enterprises chooses to rely on existing technologies to improve the status quo, instead of taking measures to break through the existing knowledge base, it will be difficult to develop new products or tap new customer needs, resulting in difficulty for the enterprise’s innovative achievements to be recognized by the market, and thus reducing sustainable performance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the technological innovation paradigm of enterprises is threatened by the external environment. Although enterprises can respond to technological iterations and establish a new knowledge base by investing more resources and costs, this will greatly increase entrepreneurial risks, especially for new enterprises, which cannot maintain high investment in technology R&D for a long time [ 51 ]. However, if the new enterprises chooses to rely on existing technologies to improve the status quo, instead of taking measures to break through the existing knowledge base, it will be difficult to develop new products or tap new customer needs, resulting in difficulty for the enterprise’s innovative achievements to be recognized by the market, and thus reducing sustainable performance.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsistemas de cobrança (ONAR; OZTAYSI;KAHRAMAN, 2018), internet banking (SZOPIŃSKI, 2016), fluxo de caixa(BADAKHSHAN et al, 2020), análise de investimentos (SERHAT; MEHMET, 2020) e avaliação de crédito (MATOS, 2019) podem ilustrar.Por fim, sistemas podem ser utilizados para visualização de questões associadas à administração geral, como sistemas: integrados de gestão (ALI; MILLER, 2017); de gestão ambiental (NEVES; SALGADO; BEIJO, 2017); de informações estratégicas (YOSHIKUNI; ALBERTIN, 2018); de gestão estratégica(MELANDER et al, 2016), de auditoria (PEREZ-CORNEJO; QUEVEDO-PUENTE; DELGADO-GARCIA, 2019); e de apoio à decisão(RUSKO, 2019). Destaca-se que os sistemas exemplificados neste tópico representam apenas uma parcela das inúmeras possibilidades de utilização da TGS em Administração.…”
unclassified