2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Body Mass Index the Best Adiposity Measure for Prostate Cancer Risk? Results From a Veterans Affairs Biopsy Cohort

Abstract: Objectives To test multiple adiposity measures and prostate cancer (PC) risk in men undergoing prostate biopsy. We hypothesized that BMI, body fat and waist circumference would be highly correlated and all would be associated with aggressive PC, but not overall risk. Subjects and methods A case (483) –control (496) study among men undergoing prostate biopsy from 2007–2016 was conducted at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Anthropometric measurements and self-reported were taken. Percent body fat wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Percent body fat, assessed with bioelectric impedance, has been associated with high-grade prostate cancer in case-control studies. 26,27 In contrast, we found no association between prospectively measured percent body fat and high-grade disease. A prospective analysis of 10,564 initially cancer-free men in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort similarly found no association between percent body fat and the risk of aggressive prostate cancer (≥cT3 or N1 or M1, Gleason grade ≥8, or pretreatment prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level ≥50 ng/mL).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Percent body fat, assessed with bioelectric impedance, has been associated with high-grade prostate cancer in case-control studies. 26,27 In contrast, we found no association between prospectively measured percent body fat and high-grade disease. A prospective analysis of 10,564 initially cancer-free men in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort similarly found no association between percent body fat and the risk of aggressive prostate cancer (≥cT3 or N1 or M1, Gleason grade ≥8, or pretreatment prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level ≥50 ng/mL).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Percent body fat, assessed with bioelectric impedance, has been associated with high‐grade prostate cancer in case‐control studies . In contrast, we found no association between prospectively measured percent body fat and high‐grade disease.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The correlation between professionally-measured waist circumference and pants size observed was 0.66, in accordance with previous findings (0.64 – 0.87), either using self-reported ( Hughes et al, 2009 , Battram et al, 2011 , Moy et al, 2018 ) or professionally-measured circumference ( Han et al, 2005 ). We also observed a strong correlation between waist or hip circumference and the other anthropometric variables (weight, BMI and silhouettes), similarly to others ( Fowke et al, 2012 , Guerrios-Rivera et al, 2017 ), where ρ was superior to 0.7. This suggests that these anthropometric variables are often interlinked.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Height and weight data were abstracted from medical records, which were recorded in real‐time. While we do not know if the values were measured or self‐reported, we have previously shown a very high correlation between measured and self‐reported heights and weights within the VA system . However, not all men had height and weight data at the exact time of CRPC diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%