Is agile the latest management fad? A review of success factors of agile transformations

Abstract

Purpose Agile is the new popular management change method and agile has lots of momentum. Management consulting firms are promoting agile via articles and newsletters. While history does not repeat itself, it often rhymes, and thus agile will probably be a successful change effort in some organizations. On the other hand, there is a high probability that agile will not deliver the expected results for most organizations. History reveals that about two-thirds of the change efforts are deemed unsuccessful – regardless of the actual change method. In this paper, we present the results of a systematic literature review on agile and we compare and contrast it with other similar organizational change methods. The purpose of this paper is to explore what one may learn from the history of the earlier change methods in terms of how organizations may succeed in their agile efforts. Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on a structured literature review of the agile concept – including agile transformation, and with a specific focus on critical success factors. Findings In addition to presenting the state of the art on agile in general, we identify, structure and categorize critical success factors (CSF) for agile. From the 13 categories, we form three clusters, which constitute a 3P framework (purpose, process and people). We also compare and contrast the CSF literature regarding agile with CSFs for organizational change in general. history indicates that most organizational change efforts are not successful. Based on the framework and the discussion, we provide recommendations to hopefully increase the probability of successful agile implementations. Originality/value Given the relative novelty or at least the renewed interest in agile, a structured literature review of the current status of this “new” method provides value as it may help organizations and managers to not repeat old mistakes – once again.

Critical success factors for lean six sigma in quality 4.0

“…When these technologies will proliferate widely, the impact of these technologies on LSS and business results may require reconfirmation. It will also be helpful in testing the claim by Naslund and Kale (2020) that nearly two-thirds of organisational change methods such as Agile and Six Sigma, eventually turn-out as fads and do not deliver desired results.…”

Critical success factors in Software Development Projects

“…According to Mkoba and Marnewick (2020) 75% of South Africa organisations use the Scrum method to manage and implement their projects. Hobbs and Petit (2017), Naslund and Kale (2020), and Lindskog and Netz (2021) share the same sentiment that Scrum is the most dominating agile method in the industry of project management.…”

“…Well-known companies and organisations like Google, Microsoft, and IBM have adopted agile methods in their projects (Olteanu, 2018). Just like other IT organisations, Accenture is also promoting Agile (Naslund & Kale, 2020). Safety and health critical software require lots of documentation and analysis before the coding can start, therefore most are developed using a Waterfall process instead of Agile (Elmezain et al, 2021).…”

Leveraging Agile Transformation: Redesigning Local Government Governance

“…The key factors for success in transforming into an agile organization were found, namely: 1) commitment; 2) the selection of a technical approach to change policy implementation; 3) collaboration and communication; 4) culture; 5) aspects of the work team; 6) operational processes; 7) defining and dividing roles; 8) incentives and performance measurement; 9) organizational structure; 10) transformation planning; 11) supporting devices (14). The new work system, implementing the bureaucracy redesign policy, supports information and communication technology infrastructure that can cyclically integrate knowledge, planning, process and implementation, monitoring and evaluation work DOI 10.18502/kss.v7i5.10589 results.…”