2021
DOI: 10.35542/osf.io/ytvn4
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a Phone-Based Language and Literacy Assessment a Reliable and Valid Measure of Children’s Reading Skills in Low-Resource Settings?

Abstract: Technology-based remote research methods are increasingly widespread, including learning assessments in child development and education research. However, little is known about whether technology-based remote assessments remain as valid and reliable as in-person assessments. We developed a low-cost phone-based language and literacy assessment for primary-school children in low-resource communities in rural Côte d’Ivoire using voice calls and SMS. We compared the reliability and validity of this phone-based as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One notable finding within the current work is the insignificant effect of vocabulary. In the current study, vocabulary was not predictive of literacy, contrary to previous work in Côte d'Ivoire using the same task (Sobers et al., 2023). The vocabulary measure, an antonym generation task, consisted of five items ( α = .61) and had comparable reliability to a 10‐item version (previously used with primary school children in Côte d'Ivoire ( α = .63)).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One notable finding within the current work is the insignificant effect of vocabulary. In the current study, vocabulary was not predictive of literacy, contrary to previous work in Côte d'Ivoire using the same task (Sobers et al., 2023). The vocabulary measure, an antonym generation task, consisted of five items ( α = .61) and had comparable reliability to a 10‐item version (previously used with primary school children in Côte d'Ivoire ( α = .63)).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Vocabulary is a robust predictor of literacy in general (de Jong & van der Leij, 2002) and this specific task has been found to predict literacy in this population (Ball et al., 2022; Jasińska et al., 2022b). We investigated the reliability and validity of language and literacy tasks in this population in a separate manuscript (Sobers et al., 2023). We found the 10‐item version of the task was fairly reliable ( α = .63) and valid (i.e., correlated with other language measures and predicted reading performance); we also replicated the analysis with a five‐item version and found similar reliability and validity (see https://osf.io/wgsud/).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ongoing literacy research program in Côte d'Ivoire was examining French literacy skills in primary school children, already including hundreds of children from dozens of schools, with follow‐up visits scheduled every 6 months from 2019 to 2022 (although COVID‐19 travel restrictions changed these procedures in 2020 and 2021; see Sobers et al., 2023). The students in this broader study were a randomly recruited pool of children in CM‐1 (the equivalent of fifth grade in the United States) classrooms across eight communities in the La Mé region of southeastern Côte d'Ivoire in 2019 and 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning over phone is still a new concept and there is much to be learned on the topic (Angrist et al 2020). In the recently developed literature on the use of phone-based education, most researchers have found positive results on student learning in Bangladesh (Wang et al 2023, Islam et al 2022, Hassan et al 2021, Kenya (Angrist et al 2023, Schueler et al 2022, Côte d'Ivoire (Sobers et al 2023), and India, Nepal, the Philippines, and Uganda (Angrist et al 2023), except for Crawfurd et al (2023) who find challenges in the implementation and spillover effects were affecting their results in Sierra Leone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%