The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is a novel conceptual unit more than the sum of its parts?: FMRI evidence from an associative recognition memory study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encoding of single items has been shown to elicit less fMRI activation in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex than associative pairs of items (Achim & Lepage, , ). Studies of unitization of word pairs have demonstrated a shift from hippocampal to perirhinal activation predicting subsequent successful associative recognition (Bader, Opitz, Reith, & Mecklinger, ; Diana, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, ), consistent with the notion that unitized pairs are encoded and retrieved more like single items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Encoding of single items has been shown to elicit less fMRI activation in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex than associative pairs of items (Achim & Lepage, , ). Studies of unitization of word pairs have demonstrated a shift from hippocampal to perirhinal activation predicting subsequent successful associative recognition (Bader, Opitz, Reith, & Mecklinger, ; Diana, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, ), consistent with the notion that unitized pairs are encoded and retrieved more like single items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…While it appears that unitization may indeed increase reliance on familiarity, it is less clear whether recollection is reduced or maintained for unitized pairs relative to nonunitized pairs. Bader et al () found reductions in expression of a HC recollection network during recognition of unitized pairs relative to nonunitized pairs, suggesting a reduction in recollection. In contrast, Diana et al () found that HC and parahippocampal cortex (PHC) activation correlated equally well with the recollection component of recognition for verbal pairs under both unitized and nonunitized conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sub-region within the medial temporal lobe that is associated with the familiarity process and supports the retrieval of unitized associations (Bader, Opitz, Reith, & Mecklinger, 2014;Diana et al, 2010;Haskins et al, 2008), was minimally affected by aging (Daselaar et al, 2006;Dulas & Duarte, 2012;Raz et al, 2005). Future research is needed to examine this speculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Due to the lower signal-to-noise ratio present in MTL (e.g., Schacter & Wagner, 1999), an uncorrected threshold of p < .005, k ≥ 10 was used. This uncorrected threshold has been used in other studies investigating MTL activity (e.g., Bader, Opitz, Reith, & Mecklinger, 2014; Diana, Yonelinas, & Ranganath, 2010; Meyer, Mecklinger, & Friederici, 2010; Wang et al, 2014), and using Monte Carlo simulations with the 3dClustSim program in the AFNI software package (NIMH), the selected voxel-wide and cluster-size thresholds allowed us to correct for multiple comparisons within the MTL ROI to p < .05. The MTL ROI was defined via the Harvard-Oxford cortical and subcortical atlases in the FSL software package (FMRIB), which have been used in studies of middle aged and older participants (e.g., Giorgio et al, 2010) as well as patient populations (e.g., Zarei et al, 2009), and included bilateral HC, and anterior (including PRC) and posterior parahippocampal gyrus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%