DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036529006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IRT model fit from different perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 132 publications
(202 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For static student models, this process can be as straightforward as assessing the power of a model to predict successes and failures from a subset of student response outcomes. Validation has also been extensively studied for static learner models such as IRT, for which statistics such as person-fit and item-fit are a standard part of most software packages (see Khalid 2009 for a recent review). However, validation is more complex for dynamically changing learner models such as CT and CBM tutors.…”
Section: Assessing Learner Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For static student models, this process can be as straightforward as assessing the power of a model to predict successes and failures from a subset of student response outcomes. Validation has also been extensively studied for static learner models such as IRT, for which statistics such as person-fit and item-fit are a standard part of most software packages (see Khalid 2009 for a recent review). However, validation is more complex for dynamically changing learner models such as CT and CBM tutors.…”
Section: Assessing Learner Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%