Proclivity to acute irritant contact dermatitis has been reviewed by comparing the response in patients with atopic dermatitis to controls. Although several controlled studies demonstrate such a proclivity, others do not, suggesting that the mechanisms involved are complex. Key words: acute irritant contact dermatitis; irritation; atopy; experimental; atopic dermatitis; sodium lauryl sulfate; transepidermal water loss. C Munksgaard, 1998.
Accepted for publication 18 August 1997Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are alleged to have defective skin barrier function in their irritated and clinically normal skin. Epidemiologic data (1, 2) and several controlled experiments (5-14, 22) suggest they may be more prone to acute irritation than a normal population. For this reason, atopic patients, on the threshold of their choice of occupation, are sometimes advised to avoid industries with an increased risk of irritant contact dermatitis (3). We review the controlled experiments (5-14, 22) to ascertain their integrity as relates to this assumption. We searched Medline (1975-1997), Contact Dermatitis (1975-1997. Key experiments are summarized in Tables 1, 2, 3. Kinunnen & Hannuksela (5) demonstrated that, in non-occluded application, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was greatly increased by propylene glycol (PG) in patients with atopic dermatitis, but less so in non-atopic normal controls; hexylene glycol (HG) did not increase TEWL in either group, suggesting that its effect on keratin is less than PG's in atopics and controls.Agner (6) showed that the response to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was statistically significantly increased in atopics compared to controls, when evaluated by visual scoring and skin thickness, but not TEWL. This dichotomy requires clarification. Baseline TEWL, measured on normal-looking skin, revealed higher values in atopics than controls. Tabata et al. (10) demonstrated, that after exposure to 1% SLS, patients with atopic dermatitis had greater and longer lasting TEWL elevation than controls. Biopsy revealed spongiosis, exocytosis of mononuclear cells and perivenular infiltrate containing eosinophils (Eo), that suggest atopic dermatitis in the atopics but not the controls.Basketter et al. (7) noted a statistically higher reaction of atopic skin to 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate compared to controls. The other 2 chemicals [35% cocotrimethyl ammonium chloride and 10% hydrochloric acid (HCl)] failed to provoke significantly different irritation in atopics compared to controls.Hannuksela & Hannuksela data (8) suggested that different methods of application of a detergent may produce dichotomous results; statistical differences in TEWL were seen between atopics and controls when applied in a plastic chamber, but not in an open (non-occluded) application.Nassif et al. (12) observed a higher % of positive results to SLS in the AD group than in controls at all SLS concentrations tested (from 0.06% to 4.0%); the same result was demonstrated in atopic allergic rhinitis patients without dermatitis. They con...