Irrigation-aspiration for culturing draining decubitus ulcers: correlation of bacteriological findings with a clinical inflammatory scoring index

Abstract

Biopsy of infected decubitus ulcers for culture disrupts tissues and may disseminate infection. Antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent dissemination of infection may adversely affect biopsy culture results. Irrigationaspiration to obtain submarginal specimens from draining decubitus ulcers was studied as an atraumatic, noninvasive culturing technique to serve as an alternative to biopsy in research activities. Two aspirates were obtained serially from 32 subjects; in 12 subjects, biopsies were also performed immediately. A median of 4.5 bacterial species was recovered per ulcer by irrigation-aspiration. Recent antimicrobial treatment had no evident effect on the recovery of bacterial species in general or, specifically, on the recovery of Bacteroides species. Concordance of results for both aspirates was 97.6% for aerobes and 91.8% for anaerobes, indicating no interactive methodological effect of the first irrigation-aspiration on the second. Compared with biopsy isolates for one aspirate, the sensitivity was 93% and the specificity was 99.0%; for another aspirate, the sensitivity was 94.7% afid the specificity was 99.5%. The positive predictive value for either aspirate was .93.9%. A weighted clinical index to score inflammatory ulcer characteristics was devised (score range, 0 to 15). In the absence of anaerobes in 15 subjects, the mean score was 6.1 ± 3.5; in the presence of anaerobes in 17 subjects, the mean score was 9.4 ± 3.2 (P = 0.008). The presence of aerobic gram-positive or gram-negative species did not significantly affect scores. Irrigation-aspiration for culture and clinical scoring of inflammation should permit independent serial measures of bacteriological and clinical courses of draining decubitus ulcers without patient risk or discomfort.

Novel protease‐based diagnostic devices for detection of wound infection

“…in two samples. These data are in good accordance with previous studies by Ehrenkranz et al . and Murray .…”

The utility of Gram stains and culture in the management of limb ulcers in persons with diabetes

“…Besides, it is reasonable to expect that reliable, microbiological characterisation of infection as part of the management strategy will almost certainly increase the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy beyond mere empiricism, resulting in reductions in antimicrobial waste and unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing, especially in countries with limited resources or with increasing occurrence of infections caused by antimicrobial‐resistant pathogens. Although none of the patients in our study had prior antimicrobial therapy before presenting to MNH with limb infections, published data suggest that recent antimicrobial treatment generally has no effect on the recovery of bacterial species in general (5).…”

Real-time bacterial fluorescence imaging accurately identifies wounds with moderate-to-heavy bacterial burden

“…A meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies 9,15,18,[21][22][23][24][25] evaluating the effectiveness of various CSS in 1056 chronic wounds found that pain was the only useful sign or symptom in diagnosing infection. 17 Other 'classic signs' of infection such as purulent exudate, erythema, heat and oedema had no predictive value in diagnosing infection, 17 which most studies classified as a bacterial load of 10 5 colony forming units/gram (CFU/g) or higher.…”