Irreparable Animosity? Centripetal versus Centrifugal Force in South Korea-Japan Mutual Perceptions, 1998-2015

Abstract

Using the framework of centripetal and centrifugal force, this article analyzes alternating periods of peace and conflict in South Korea-Japan mutual perceptions since 1998 when the two nations took unprecedented conciliatory actions. Centripetal force is comprised of political leaders' reconciliation initiatives, restrained historical/territorial disputes, and common security threats. Centrifugal force incorporates heated historical/territorial disputes, political leaders' use of those disputes for their political purposes, and divergent security priorities. This article suggests that top political leaders in both nations can play a significant role in improving or aggravating mutual perceptions between the two neighbors. However, political leaders' conciliatory initiatives are a necessary but insufficient condition in reconciling the two former adversary states.

From perpetrator to peacebuilder: Rethinking education in conflict-affected societies

“…e dominance of hill high castes and their native language on ethnic minorities in Nepal (Pherali, 2011), depictions of Tamils as the historical 'other' in Singhalese textbooks (Nissanka, 2016) and misrepresentation of the Second World War atrocities performed by Japanese troops in China and Korea (Ku, 2016) all exemplify how education can become a problem from a con ict perspective. In Rwanda, post-independence educational policies and the ethnicity-based quota system denied many Tutsi children access to education (McLean Hilker, 2011).…”

(Re)producing the ‘history problem’: memory, identity and the Japan-South Korea trade dispute

“…The relationship between Japan and South Korea has consistently been presented by scholars of International Relations (IR) as a puzzle that confounds the expectations of mainstream rationalist theory (see, among others, Cha, 1999;Jackson, 2018;Ku, 2016;Lee, 2013;Park, 2008). Specifically, it is deemed confounding that, in the realist case, two regional allies of the United States (US) who supposedly share common security threats and, in the liberal case, two liberal democracies with strong trade and cultural relations have such a poor bilateral relationship.…”