2022
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7655/ac6f7f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiation damage concurrent challenges with RAFM and ODS steels for fusion reactor first-wall/blanket: a review

Abstract: Reduced activation ferritic-martensitic (RAFM) and oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) steels are the most promising candidates for fusion first-wall/blanket (FW/B) structures. Performance of these steels will deteriorate in-service due to neutron damage and transmutation-induced gases like helium/hydrogen at elevated operating temperatures. Here, after highlighting the operating conditions of fusion reactor concepts and a brief overview, the major irradiation-induced degradation challenges associated with RAF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 407 publications
(713 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a predicted difference, if validated, could have dramatic implications for any carbon compound's potential use in a fusion reactor-either the material lifetime will be severely limited due to helium-induced swelling or embrittlement, or the material will require advanced microstructural engineering to allow it to accommodate high gas production without failure. In any case, the observations here confirm that there must be an effort to reinstate the (n,n ′ 2α) for 12 C into the next releases of libraries like TENDL, and also that there is a need for further experiments to evaluate this potentially highly impactful reaction channel-the data points are highly scattered in figure 6.…”
Section: Helium Production In Carbonsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a predicted difference, if validated, could have dramatic implications for any carbon compound's potential use in a fusion reactor-either the material lifetime will be severely limited due to helium-induced swelling or embrittlement, or the material will require advanced microstructural engineering to allow it to accommodate high gas production without failure. In any case, the observations here confirm that there must be an effort to reinstate the (n,n ′ 2α) for 12 C into the next releases of libraries like TENDL, and also that there is a need for further experiments to evaluate this potentially highly impactful reaction channel-the data points are highly scattered in figure 6.…”
Section: Helium Production In Carbonsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In figure 6, EXFOR cross section data associated with the typical (n,α) channel for He production is shown for the primary stable isotope of C, 12 C (98.93% of natural carbon). Also shown, is data attributed to an alternative, more exotic nuclear reaction channel, which involves neutron capture followed by the break-up of 12 C into three α-particles and a residual neutron. Typically designated as (n,n ′ 2α) (the third α particle of 4 He nucleus is the remaining residual in this convention), the figure shows that there is experimental data that provides strong evidence of a non-negligible cross section for this channel at and around the 14 MeV neutron energies of the deuterium-tritium fusion reaction.…”
Section: Helium Production In Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for the bigger size of MX precipitates in Eurofer 97 is still unclear. However, it could be one reason for that RAFM steels show worse thermal creep properties than many present-day 9% Cr steels [47] , such as the 9Cr3W3CoVNbBN steel [48] , 10%Cr martensitic steels [49] , and 9Cr-1Mo martensitic steel [50] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, during a typical neutron irradiation experiment in a thermal test reactor, the end-of-life damage is 3-5dpa/year, likewise a fast reactor gives 20dpa/year. The average of end-of-life damage for components of a BWR core is 10 dpa, for PWR it is 80 dpa and for Advanced Fast Reactor it is 200 dpa [22][23][24][25] The computational simulation used was made with the FORTRAN programming language in which is only compatible with a Linux operating system. The simulation takes into account target material properties and several incident beam parameters.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%