Iranians’ contribution to world literature on neuroscience

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyse Iranian scientific publications in the neuroscience subfields by librarians and neuroscientists, using Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) via Web of Science data over the period, 2002-2008. Methods: Data were retrieved from the SCIE. Data were collected from the 'subject area' of the database and classified by neuroscience experts into 14 subfields. To identify the citation patterns, we applied the 'impact factor' and the 'number of publication'. Data were also analysed using HISTCITE, Excel 2007 and SPSS. (264) classified in the neuropharmacology subfield. There were fewer papers in neurohistory, psychopharmacology and artificial intelligence. International contributions of authors were mostly in the neurology subfield, and 'Collaboration Coefficient' for the neuroscience subfields in Iran was 0.686 which is acceptable. Most international collaboration between Iranians and developed countries was from USA. Eighty-seven percent of the published papers were in journals with the impact factor between 0 and 4; 25% of papers were published by the researchers affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Conclusion: Progress of neuroscience in Iran is mostly seen in the neuropharmacology and the neurology subfields. Other subfields should also be considered as a research priority by health policymakers. As this study was carried out by the collaboration of librarians and neuroscientists, it has been proved valuable for both librarians and policymakers. This study may be encouraging for librarians from other developing countries.Keywords: authors' collaboration, Iran, medical librarians, neuroscience, scientific production, scientometrics. Key MessagesImplications for Practice Identifying Iranian researchers' publications to help in journals selection policy.

Neurosciences in Brazil: a bibliometric study of main characteristics, collaboration and citations

“…Aware of the current importance of Neurosciences, researchers from other countries have conducted different bibliometric studies on the topic: China (Xu et al 2003), Sweden (Gla ¨nzel et al 2003), Cuba (Dorta-Contreras et al 2008), India (Shahabudin 2013), Iran (Ashrafi et al 2012) and Canada (Haustein et al 2013). To date, Brazilian studies in the area show a qualitative bias and do not cover the entire national territory.…”

Historical perspective of neurology in Iran

“…Most of the papers of Iranian researchers related to neuroscience have been published in 2006 to 2008, when the neurology and neuropharmacology subfields had the highest trend of publications. 68 …”

“…Even though neuroscience is a relatively new specialty in this country, Iranians have taken great contributions in international neuroscience, publishing several papers, mainly in neuropharmacology subfield, and fewer papers in neurohistory, psychopharmacology, and artificial intelligence. 68 Another achievement of Iran is the development of neuroimaging methods in the country; as reported, more than 88% of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed by neurosurgeons, orthopedists, and neurologists in the country and the most common organs scanned include the spine (55%), brain (26%), and knee (11%). 69 Despite valuable contributions, further scientific work is required for empowering the infrastructures.…”

Social network analysis of Iranian researchers on emergency medicine: a sociogram analysis

“…To determine the subject of papers among components, a panel composed of a clinical librarian and two emergency specialists as subject experts, who were suggested by our previous study,5 discussed and analysed content of each paper separately. They studied all the titles and abstracts as well as authors’ keywords and unified similar terms to create agreed terminology for topics.…”