1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1986.tb03597.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iopamidol myelography in the horse

Abstract: Summary The use of the non‐ionic, water‐soluble contrast agent iopamidol for myelography in seven horses is described. Contrast columns of diagnostic quality were produced in all seven cases and the procedure did not invoke any adverse reactions in the five cases which were recovered from general anaesthesia. It is concluded that iopamidol is a safe and effective contrast agent for myelography in the horse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only evidence of toxicity caused by the contrast media in all the clinical, neurological and pathological examinations was the presence of slight extradural oedema in six of ten horses, and a significant increase in the white blood cell numbers and specific gravity of the CSF. The increase in white blood cells after iohexol myelography was, however, markedly less than that recorded 48 h post myelography for metrizamide (range two to 2,110 x 100 wbc/L) (Nyeland et a/ 1980), and slightly less than that recorded four days post myelography for iopamidol (May et a/ 1986). Histopathological changes in the brain and spinal cord were also less than that recorded at 48 h after metrizamide myelography (Nyeland et a/ 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only evidence of toxicity caused by the contrast media in all the clinical, neurological and pathological examinations was the presence of slight extradural oedema in six of ten horses, and a significant increase in the white blood cell numbers and specific gravity of the CSF. The increase in white blood cells after iohexol myelography was, however, markedly less than that recorded 48 h post myelography for metrizamide (range two to 2,110 x 100 wbc/L) (Nyeland et a/ 1980), and slightly less than that recorded four days post myelography for iopamidol (May et a/ 1986). Histopathological changes in the brain and spinal cord were also less than that recorded at 48 h after metrizamide myelography (Nyeland et a/ 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A report on the use of iopamidol (May, Wyn-Jones and Church 1986) indicated that it may be a safe, effective contrast agent in the horse. It was evaluated in seven horses, five of which had recovered from anaesthesia and were therefore available for post myelographic assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both concentrations exhibited slight extradural oedema and increased (mononuclear) white blood cell counts and specific gravity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [175]. Similar changes occur with iopamidol and both are less damaging than metrizamide [145,[175][176][177][178][179][180][181] analogous to other species [182][183][184][185]. Despite the lack of reports confirming use of 350 mg I/mL to be detrimental, most equine clinicians still adhere to human guidelines [104,142,186,187].…”
Section: Intrasynovialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although any contrast medium injected in the subarachnoid space can cause complications including seizure activity and intensification of neurologic signs, the complication rate is higher with metrizamide than with newer nonionic agents. 3,[6][7][8][9] We hypothesized that the increased safety of the newer myelographic agents would make clinical use of standing myelography feasible in the horse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%