2003
DOI: 10.1021/bm025664a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic Strength Dependence of Protein-Polyelectrolyte Interactions

Abstract: The effect of univalent electrolyte concentration on protein-polyelectrolyte complex formation has been measured by frontal analysis continuous capillary electrophoresis (FACCE) and turbidimetry for the interaction of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with a synthetic hydrophobically modified polyacid, for BSA with (porcine mucosal) heparin (Hp), a highly charged polyanion, and for Hp and insulin. All three highly diverse systems display maxima or plateaus in complex formation in the range of ionic strength 5 < I < 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
386
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
31
386
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…25 /AAm 75 can be expected to facilitate polymer configurations that will reduce the repulsive effect arising from negatively charged protein domains and favor the alignments around the positively charged protein domains. 44 The stiffness of HA corresponds to a restriction of chain movements, so that the bound configuration may not readily avoid negative domains, and therefore binding cannot take place when the net charge is strongly negative. As seen in the micelle-binding case discussed above, the difference between flexible and semiflexible polyions increases at high salt, while the phase boundaries converge at low salt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 /AAm 75 can be expected to facilitate polymer configurations that will reduce the repulsive effect arising from negatively charged protein domains and favor the alignments around the positively charged protein domains. 44 The stiffness of HA corresponds to a restriction of chain movements, so that the bound configuration may not readily avoid negative domains, and therefore binding cannot take place when the net charge is strongly negative. As seen in the micelle-binding case discussed above, the difference between flexible and semiflexible polyions increases at high salt, while the phase boundaries converge at low salt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At these conditions, an additional complexity that arises is that optimal binding occurs when the polycation not only interacts with the negative patch of the protein but also avoids the surrounding positive regions; these regions can be visualized by electrostatic protein modeling. 24 Chain flexibility clearly plays a more interesting and complicated role in these cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most generally, the strength of the electrostatic interaction was found to depend on polyelectrolyte characteristics such as charge density, chain length, and chain flexibility; colloidal aspects, i.e., colloid surface charge density, size, and shape; and extensive system variables, i.e., temperature, pH, and ionic strength of the medium. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The magnitude of the electrostatic interaction between the polyelectrolyte and the oppositely charged colloid is found to increase with colloid surface charge density σ and polyelectrolyte linear charge density and diminish with salt concentration I. One way to express a consensus among the numerous experimental investigations and their theoretical or simulation counterparts would thus be 26 where σ c is the critical colloid surface charge density at the onset of complex formation and κ is the DebyeHuckel parameter, with a and b being either obtained as empirical scaling parameters or derived theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turbidimetric measurements were carried out with a UV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV visible 1603, Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Kyoto, Japan) at the wavelength = 420 nm [8,16,37]. Solutions of 0.05% (w/v) of Carbopol and Noveon in distilled water and 0.1% of chitosan (w/v) in 0.1% lactic acid solution (w/v) were prepared.…”
Section: Turbidimetric Titrationmentioning
confidence: 99%