2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic conduction and vibrational characteristics of Al3+ modified monoclinic LiZr2(PO4)3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basal spacing was enlarged by 0.25 nm after Al-pillaring, which was wider than twice of the diameter of an Al 3+ ion (d = 0.106 nm, Al 3+ tetrahedral 4-coordinated). [30][31][32] These observations confirmed Al species had entered the interlayer space of the Mt clay. The small peak observed at 2⊔ = 9°for Al-PILC could be suggesting a very small fraction of the clay was not pillared.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The basal spacing was enlarged by 0.25 nm after Al-pillaring, which was wider than twice of the diameter of an Al 3+ ion (d = 0.106 nm, Al 3+ tetrahedral 4-coordinated). [30][31][32] These observations confirmed Al species had entered the interlayer space of the Mt clay. The small peak observed at 2⊔ = 9°for Al-PILC could be suggesting a very small fraction of the clay was not pillared.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For sample Al‐PILC, the (001) peak shifted toward a lower value of 5.08°, corresponding to a d‐value of 1.74 nm, thus, a basal spaces of 0.78 nm. The basal spacing was enlarged by 0.25 nm after Al‐pillaring, which was wider than twice of the diameter of an Al 3+ ion (d = 0.106 nm, Al 3+ tetrahedral 4‐coordinated) . These observations confirmed Al species had entered the interlayer space of the Mt clay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 The ion conductivity of these films also matches some reports for bulk, aluminum-doped LZP at room temperature (~2.5 × 10 −6 S/cm). 11,30 There are two possible contributing factors to the increased ion conductivity of these films. First, the stabilization of the fast ion conducting rhombohedral phase and second, the measurement geometry limiting the number of resistive grain-boundary interfaces that are introduced to the conduction path, resulting in an ion conductivity value that approaches the intrinsic ('bulk') ion conductivity of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%