2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-plasma protective coatings of CdTe surface for X- and gamma-ray detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear relationship between the current and voltage from −1 to 1 V was observed, as shown by the inset of Figure a,c. The corresponding bulk resistivity of MPB1 was estimated to be ∼5.6 × 10 8 Ω·cm, which is comparable to that of the detector-grade CdTe crystals . However, the bulk resistivity of MPB2 was only ∼2.6 × 10 7 Ω·cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear relationship between the current and voltage from −1 to 1 V was observed, as shown by the inset of Figure a,c. The corresponding bulk resistivity of MPB1 was estimated to be ∼5.6 × 10 8 Ω·cm, which is comparable to that of the detector-grade CdTe crystals . However, the bulk resistivity of MPB2 was only ∼2.6 × 10 7 Ω·cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The corresponding bulk resistivity of MPB1 was estimated to be ∼5.6 × 10 8 Ω•cm, which is comparable to that of the detector-grade CdTe crystals. 39 However, the bulk resistivity of MPB2 was only ∼2.6 × 10 7 Ω•cm. To increase the charge collection efficiency, higher operation voltage is usually adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%