2000
DOI: 10.2172/760428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion Exchange Studies for Removal of Sulfate from Hanford Tank Waste Envelope C (241-AN-107) Using SuperLig 655 Resin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a novel proprietary resin tested on Hanford supernatant tank waste turned out to be ineffective because of either a lack of sufficient sulfate affinity or its apparent degradation. 41,89 Although liquid−liquid extraction is normally associated with high selectivity, it generally selects against sulfate and thus has not proved very useful for applications where the competitive extraction of sulfate from other electrolyte ions is required. Sulfate extraction is a challenge owing to the high hydration energy of this particular dianion, −1090 kJ/mol, compared with hydration energies of −306 kJ/mol for nitrate and −347 kJ/mol for chloride.…”
Section: Traditional Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a novel proprietary resin tested on Hanford supernatant tank waste turned out to be ineffective because of either a lack of sufficient sulfate affinity or its apparent degradation. 41,89 Although liquid−liquid extraction is normally associated with high selectivity, it generally selects against sulfate and thus has not proved very useful for applications where the competitive extraction of sulfate from other electrolyte ions is required. Sulfate extraction is a challenge owing to the high hydration energy of this particular dianion, −1090 kJ/mol, compared with hydration energies of −306 kJ/mol for nitrate and −347 kJ/mol for chloride.…”
Section: Traditional Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No attempts to use strong-base resins for this application have been reported. However, a novel proprietary resin tested on Hanford supernatant tank waste turned out to be ineffective because of either a lack of sufficient sulfate affinity or its apparent degradation. , …”
Section: Traditional Separation Methods Applicable To Sulfatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous techniques have been studied for the removal of SO 4 2− from aqueous solutions including but not limited to molecular recognition, 1 precipitation, 5 ion-exchange, 6 reverse osmosis, 7 and adsorption. 8 Yet to be developed, however, is a material or technology that is promising for large-scale implementation at nuclear waste sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Considerable effort has been devoted to the synthesis of receptors that might allow the removal of sulfate from the highly basic nitrate-rich mixtures produced by the pretreatment of the original radioactive waste with NaOH. 25 Consequently, one of the current challenges in anion recognition chemistry involves the preparation of receptors that show high sulfate/nitrate selectivity. 26 Sulfate recognition in aqueous media is difficult because of its high hydration energy (ΔG h = −1080 kJ mol −1 vs. −300 kJ mol −1 for nitrate), 27 and extreme hydrophilicity according to the Hofmeister series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%