Ion Budgets and Sediment−Water Interactions during the Experimental Acidification and Recovery of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin

Abstract

Ion budgets for the two basins of experimentally acidified Little Rock Lake (Vilas County, WI, U.S.A.) indicate that Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+ were released from the bottom sediments to the water column during 1984-1994, and NH4+, NO3-, and SO4(2-) were removed for a net internal alkalinity generation (IAG). Sulfate removal contributed approximately 50% of the IAG in the reference basin, and cation production generated approximately 40%. In-lake processes in the reference basin removed approximately 38% of the sulfate input; 58% was lost to outflow, and 4% remained in the water column. As a result of acid additions that stimulated sulfate reduction and lower pH that enhanced ion exchange, sulfate removal and Ca2+ production were more important for IAG in the treatment basin. During 1984-1994, sulfate removal contributed about 61% of the IAG, and Ca2+ production contributed about half of the IAG from cation production. In the treatment basin, in-lake processes removed about 46% of the total input of sulfate (including acid additions); 36% was lost to outflow and 18% remained in the water column (representing approximately 25% of the added acid). In both basins of LRL, NH4+ consumption roughly balanced NO3- consumption, and net N transformations provided only 3-12% of the IAG. Overall, Na+ and Cl- were conservative in both basins during 1984-1994. Most ion budget components, including calculated internal reaction terms, showed fairly large interannual variations; e.g., ion inputs (dominated by atmospheric deposition) varied by a factor of about two. Over the 10-year period, ANC terms calculated from the budgets as the difference between base cation and acid anion terms agreed well with measured ANC terms for the budget components, indicating that the budgets accounted for all important IAG constituents.

Methylmercury in Freshwater Fish Linked to Atmospheric Mercury Deposition

“…These results point to SO 4 2- availability as a potentially important factor influencing MeHg production in freshwatersystems (). Atmospheric deposition can be a major source of sulfate to some aquatic systems ( , ). However, there is no relationship between MeHg in largemouth bass and wet SO 4 2- deposition when all of the states are considered, and only a moderate correlation when New Hampshire, Maine, and Georgia and excluded (Table ).…”