2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involving users and user roles in the transition to sustainable mobility systems: The case of light electric vehicle sharing in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework can be useful for other studies to analyze the transition trajectories toward alternative systems. However, the system users and their demands can have an influential role in the transformation of urban systems and the emergence of system alternatives [36,37]. Further studies are needed to analyze their agency in technology-driven transitions in different contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework can be useful for other studies to analyze the transition trajectories toward alternative systems. However, the system users and their demands can have an influential role in the transformation of urban systems and the emergence of system alternatives [36,37]. Further studies are needed to analyze their agency in technology-driven transitions in different contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contributes 14% of all global GHG emissions (Lee et al 2018 ), mostly as a consequence of road transportation (Fan et al 2018 ). Alternative sustainable technologies, as such, are one possible solution, and transforming consumer habits and lifestyles are another (Kramberger et al 2014 ; Cramton et al 2018 ; McCollum et al 2017 ; Sopjani et al 2018 ). In this respect, unveiling the consumers’ attitudes, preferences, and decision factors towards zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) is necessary for the formulation of effective policy measures, the effective commercialization and promotion of ZEVs for post-fossil and more sustainable personal transportation (Bockarjova and Steg 2014 ; Komiyama and Kraines, 2008 ; Fan et al 2018 ) that has become “an embraced goal” of many countries around the world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge this is a challenge. Nevertheless, studies identify numerous benefits of user involvement, for example enhancing user satisfaction and acceptance of the innovation (Hyysalo, 2016;Sopjani et al, 2019;von Hippel, 2005) as well offer numerous approaches involving users (see De Vries, Van Waes, Van Est, Van Der Meulen, & Brom, 2015, p. 65).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a user perspective, a smart mobility transition implies that users would have to change their mobility behaviour (Mont, 2004;Schot & Geels, 2008;Sopjani, Stier, Ritzén, Hesselgren, & Georén, 2019), by following real-time traffic and travel advice to avoid traffic jams, or using car-and ride-sharing applications. This transition path reinforces that the challenge for smart mobility transition is not merely designing the innovations, but also implementing them in ways that stimulate users to change their travel behaviour (Sopjani et al, 2019). In other words, the challenge is about designing smart mobility innovations that match user needs, and knowing user needs also requires involving users in the design process (Hyysalo, 2016;Kujala, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%