1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00133-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of calmodulin in the activation of store‐operated Ca2+ entry in rat hepatocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,32,37,[41][42][43] However, the mechanism of this regulation is still unknown. Furthermore, the results of studies with rat hepatocytes led Cao and Chatton 46 to suggest that calmodulin is required for the activation of hepatocyte SOCs. Therefore, the role of calmodulin in the activation of SOCs in H4-IIE cells was investigated.…”
Section: Identification Of a Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,32,37,[41][42][43] However, the mechanism of this regulation is still unknown. Furthermore, the results of studies with rat hepatocytes led Cao and Chatton 46 to suggest that calmodulin is required for the activation of hepatocyte SOCs. Therefore, the role of calmodulin in the activation of SOCs in H4-IIE cells was investigated.…”
Section: Identification Of a Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ca 2+ ‐binding protein CaM has an important regulatory effect on many Ca 2+ ‐permeable ion channels (Zhu, 2005) and therefore not surprisingly the role of CaM has been investigated on SOCs in many cell systems. However, these experiments have produced much conflicting data (Vaca, 1996; Cao & Chatton, 1998; Vazquez et al ., 2000; Machaca, 2003; Litjens et al ., 2004; Moreau et al ., 2005) and thus there is no consistent picture on the role for CaM on SOCs. These discrepancies may be accounted for by the use of cell lines and cultured cells that may contain a variety of different Ca 2+ entry pathways and underlying molecular entities (see Parekh & Putney (2005) for different types of SOCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we observed essentially the same effects with the CAM antagonists as with the CAMKII inhibitor, we cannot exclude a role of CAM itself in the regulatory process. Although it has been shown by others that some CAM antagonists could directly inhibit both VDCC and SOC channels (26,27), the experiments shown in Figs. 2 and 3 allow us to exclude a direct interaction of the CAM inhibitors with the channel itself, which would be observed regardless at which point of the assay the drug is added to the bath.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%