2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involved Node, Site, Field and Residual Volume Radiotherapy for Lymphoma: A Comparison of Organ at Risk Dosimetry and Second Malignancy Risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the latent period for developing radiation‐induced solid tumors is 10 to 60 yr or more . Only a few dosimetric studies have provided data about the probability for carcinogenesis following ISRT in the mediastinum . The cancer risk assessments of these reports were based on the OED concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is well known that the latent period for developing radiation‐induced solid tumors is 10 to 60 yr or more . Only a few dosimetric studies have provided data about the probability for carcinogenesis following ISRT in the mediastinum . The cancer risk assessments of these reports were based on the OED concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the LAR for esophageal cancer development of any study participant as estimated with the mechanistic approach differed by 65.5% or more from that calculated with the bell‐shaped model. Reported experience suggested that the OED of esophagus used for estimating the relevant carcinogenic effects can be defined by using the model parameters of stomach . Previous studies have already reported large deviations between the mechanistic and bell‐shaped models in the estimation of the radiotherapy‐induced stomach cancer risk …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations