Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1215/00127094-3793141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involutive Heegaard Floer homology

Abstract: Abstract. Using the conjugation symmetry on Heegaard Floer complexes, we define a three-manifold invariant called involutive Heegaard Floer homology, which is meant to correspond to Z4-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology. Further, we obtain two new invariants of homology cobordism, d andd, and two invariants of smooth knot concordance, V 0 and V 0. We also develop a formula for the involutive Heegaard Floer homology of large integral surgeries on knots. We give explicit calculations in the case of L-spac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
279
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(261 reference statements)
1
279
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lin constructed a G‐equivariant refinement of monopole Floer homology in the setting of Kronheimer–Mrowka . In the setting of Heegaard Floer homology introduced by Ozsváth–Szabó in , Hendricks and Manolescu defined an analogue, HFI(Y,s), of Z/4‐equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer homology (where we regard j=Z/4G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin constructed a G‐equivariant refinement of monopole Floer homology in the setting of Kronheimer–Mrowka . In the setting of Heegaard Floer homology introduced by Ozsváth–Szabó in , Hendricks and Manolescu defined an analogue, HFI(Y,s), of Z/4‐equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer homology (where we regard j=Z/4G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hendricks and Manolescu construct a refinement of Heegaard Floer homology, called involutive Heegaard Floer homology . They define a module italicHFIfalse(Y,fraktursfalse) over double-struckF2false[U,Qfalse]/false(Q2false) as the homology of the mapping cone italicCFIfalse(Y,fraktursfalse):=Cone(italicCFfalse(Y,fraktursfalse)Q·(id+ι)Q·italicCFfalse(Y,fraktursfalse)),where Q is a formal variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chain complex CFscriptLfalse(Y,double-struckK,fraktursfalse) has a filtration over ZZ. If K is null‐homologous and frakturs is a self‐conjugate Spinc structure, Hendricks and Manolescu consider a conjugation map ιK:CFscriptLfalse(Y,double-struckK,fraktursfalse)CFscriptLfalse(Y,double-struckK,fraktursfalse).Unlike the map ι on italicCFfalse(Y,fraktursfalse), the map ιK is not a homotopy involution. Instead, the map ιK satisfies ιK2ρ,where ρ is the map induced by the diffeomorphism ρ:(Y,K,p,q)(Y,K,p,q) obtained by twisting the knot K in one full twist, in the direction of its orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations