2003
DOI: 10.1080/10293523.2003.11082448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment Basics XLVI. On estimating the beta coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The average Beta estimate of the market should be 1 because market-related systematic risk of the market index is one: market returns move in line with market returns exactly (trivially). Bradfield (2003) var(M ) , the systematic risk is underestimated for thinly traded shares because the numerator is reduced. On the contrary, because the mean Beta for all shares on an index is 1, the Beta for frequently traded shares is thus upwardly biased.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average Beta estimate of the market should be 1 because market-related systematic risk of the market index is one: market returns move in line with market returns exactly (trivially). Bradfield (2003) var(M ) , the systematic risk is underestimated for thinly traded shares because the numerator is reduced. On the contrary, because the mean Beta for all shares on an index is 1, the Beta for frequently traded shares is thus upwardly biased.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Bradfield (2003) discusses the regression bias property of Beta estimates, first documented by Blume (1971). The regression bias states that a Beta that is significantly higher than average (of all listed shares) is overestimated, and conversely, an estimate that is significantly lower than average is underestimated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), being a measure of the percentage of total risk accounted for by the non-diversifiable, systematic risk, ranged from 0.04 for Co. 1 to 0.43 for Co.8. The share of the systematic risk within the total risk is usually found to be lower than the share of the diversifiable unsystematic risk (Hotvedt and Tedder, 1978;Bradfield, 2003), as revealed in the case of the Macedonian agri-food companies. It is important to stress that in this type of analysis there is no direct relation between beta and R 2 ; hence, high beta does not necessarily produce a high coefficient of determination.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Macroeconomic Overview Of The Macedonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2005, the index MBI10 was introduced, which is a price index weighted with market capitalization and refers to companies quoted on the official market. As such, it is suitable for assessment of systematic risk (Bradfield, 2003). In 2007, MSE started to calculate a new index of publicly held companies -MBID, i.e., for companies quoted on the regular market.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Macroeconomic Overview Of The Macedonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation