APA Handbook of Forensic Psychology, Vol. 2: Criminal Investigation, Adjudication, and Sentencing Outcomes. 2015
DOI: 10.1037/14462-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigative psychology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…two offenders who commit a certain type of crime in a similar way will show similar characteristics) may only be valid for specific offence behaviors and single offender characteristics (e.g. Taylor, Snook, Bennell, & Porter, 2015;ter Beek et al, 2010). This opposes the idea that broader offence behavior clusters (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…two offenders who commit a certain type of crime in a similar way will show similar characteristics) may only be valid for specific offence behaviors and single offender characteristics (e.g. Taylor, Snook, Bennell, & Porter, 2015;ter Beek et al, 2010). This opposes the idea that broader offence behavior clusters (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The general finding that only some preconvictions seem to be related to offense behaviors is mirrored in previous studies that have used a similar bivariate linking approach (e.g., Almond et al, 2021; Cole & Brown, 2014), which lends some support to the assumption that the link between offender characteristics and crime scene behaviors in general may be highly idiosyncratic. Accordingly, it has been argued that homology as the core tenet of offender profiling (i.e., two offenders who commit a certain type of crime in a similar way will show similar characteristics) may only be valid for specific offense behaviors and single offender characteristics (e.g., Taylor et al, 2015; ter Beek et al, 2010). This opposes the idea that broader offense behavior clusters (e.g., themes) could be empirically associated with a standard set of background characteristics (e.g., offender types), which indeed has proven difficult in prior research (Mokros & Alison, 2002; Trojan & Salfati, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the general area of forensic psychology, a number of significant relationships have emerged between researchers and practitioners; this has developed into a strong partnership that benefits both parties, resulting in a demand for evidence‐based research, with outcomes that may have a subsequent impact on operational practice in the community (Taylor, Snook, Bennell, & Porter, ). For example, Wermink et al () highlighted the use of empirical research to inform the sentencing of offenders, in addition to other judicial and practical decisions, such as the type of action, treatment, community management, and supervision needs (Craig, Beech, & Cortoni, ; Hilton, Harris, & Rice, ; Soothill, Francis, & Liu, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%