1964
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(64)90013-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations of some assumptions and characteristics of a procedure for instrumental conditioning in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criterion tasks were the Marble-in-the-Hole persistence game employed by Berkowitz and Zigler and a two-color discrimination learning task. The latter measure was used in order to circumvent some of the difficulties, for example, position preferences, which recently have been found (Parton & Ross, 1965;Patterson & Hinsey, 1964) with the typical preference-switching marble game as a learning measure. Since the four preliminary tasks and the Marble-in-the-Hole Game are described in some detail elsewhere (Berkowitz & Zigler, 1965) a description of only the learning apparatus will be included here.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criterion tasks were the Marble-in-the-Hole persistence game employed by Berkowitz and Zigler and a two-color discrimination learning task. The latter measure was used in order to circumvent some of the difficulties, for example, position preferences, which recently have been found (Parton & Ross, 1965;Patterson & Hinsey, 1964) with the typical preference-switching marble game as a learning measure. Since the four preliminary tasks and the Marble-in-the-Hole Game are described in some detail elsewhere (Berkowitz & Zigler, 1965) a description of only the learning apparatus will be included here.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterson & Hinsey (1964) found a .75 correlation on test-retest using the marble box, suggesting that the conditioning by social reinforcers can be stable when all parameters are held constant. The effects of apparatus, reinforcing agent, and schedules of reinforcement should be better understood before further theorizing and experimentation are done with social responsiveness (defined by conditioning scores).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…and computing the median proportion for the base operant period and the experimental period. The difference score for each individual on both apparatuses was converted to a T Score (Patterson & Hinsey, 1964).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%