2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(00)00018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
180
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is an established non-destructive technique (Binda et al 1998, Binda et al 2000, Moropoulou & Labropoulos 2015, which exploits the wave character of electromagnetic fields and is based on the propagation and analysis of electromagnetic radiation to image the examined structure. The ground penetrating radar system used in this survey was a MALÅ Geoscience ProEx system with 1.6GHz and 2.3GHz antennae.…”
Section: Gpr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is an established non-destructive technique (Binda et al 1998, Binda et al 2000, Moropoulou & Labropoulos 2015, which exploits the wave character of electromagnetic fields and is based on the propagation and analysis of electromagnetic radiation to image the examined structure. The ground penetrating radar system used in this survey was a MALÅ Geoscience ProEx system with 1.6GHz and 2.3GHz antennae.…”
Section: Gpr Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important experience and curiosity of people performing an inventory of damages in such buildings. In the cases of difficulties in access to damage modern technologies can be useful, for example: digital photogrammetry, 3D scanning [13] or increasingly popular thermography [14,15].…”
Section: Crack-by-crack Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are complex inspections that may involve non-negligible costs, such as radiography, thermography and infrared photography, ultra-sound, magnetometer, and endoscopic measurements. Some of these techniques have some drawbacks, such as the need for the equipment to be handled by professionals with much experience, and the complex nature of interpretation of the results ( Binda et al ., 2000 ;Santos et al ., 2003 ;Magalh ã es et al ., 2005 ).…”
Section: Stages Of An Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%