2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2016.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on the variation of the step-terrace structure on the surface of polished GaN wafer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic step-terrace topography is determined by the crystal structure of GaN and shows real crystallographic information of the GaN surface. There are two distinct types of atomic step-terraces called “a–a type” and “a–b type” in different areas of the GaN surface. , The width of the “a–a type” terrace is almost the same, and the height of the “a–a type” terrace is about 0.264 nm, which is equivalent to the thickness of one Ga–N bilayer . The “a–b type” terrace features unequal widths of step a and step b, which may be ascribed to the original stacked structure of the “ABAB...” type of GaN crystal .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The atomic step-terrace topography is determined by the crystal structure of GaN and shows real crystallographic information of the GaN surface. There are two distinct types of atomic step-terraces called “a–a type” and “a–b type” in different areas of the GaN surface. , The width of the “a–a type” terrace is almost the same, and the height of the “a–a type” terrace is about 0.264 nm, which is equivalent to the thickness of one Ga–N bilayer . The “a–b type” terrace features unequal widths of step a and step b, which may be ascribed to the original stacked structure of the “ABAB...” type of GaN crystal .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two distinct types of atomic step-terraces called “a–a type” and “a–b type” in different areas of the GaN surface. , The width of the “a–a type” terrace is almost the same, and the height of the “a–a type” terrace is about 0.264 nm, which is equivalent to the thickness of one Ga–N bilayer . The “a–b type” terrace features unequal widths of step a and step b, which may be ascribed to the original stacked structure of the “ABAB...” type of GaN crystal . The average height of the “a–b type” terrace is about 0.39 ± 0.05 nm, which probably originates from the Ga-N-Ga three-layers structure (∼0.33 nm) and is affected by the Ga 2 O 3 on the GaN surface (as XPS results show).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1f shows the atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of bare AlGaN with an atomic stepterrace topography because the c-axis orientation of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT often possesses an off-angle deflection resulting from slightly miscut c-plane sapphire substrates, not absolute 0°-off. 32 The AFM image of h-BN grown on AlGaN also shows an atomic step-terrace topography over the whole wafer (Figure 1g) (and Supporting Information, Figure S1), and the surface morphology of these samples is analogous with roughness values of 0.35−0.45 nm, indicating that the h-BN grown on AlGaN exhibits an atomically smooth surface.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-efficiency, high-reliability, and long-lifespan micro/nanodevices require the nondestructive GaN substrate with subnanometer surface roughness and global geometric accuracy. Nowadays, the chemical mechanical polishing/planarization (CMP) that utilizes the coupling effect of external mechanical interactions (impact and scratch due to nanoparticles) and chemical reactions (polishing slurries) has emerged as the main processing method for hard-brittle materials to limit lattice defects and achieve global planarization effectively [7][8][9][10]. Nevertheless, the lack of fundamental understanding of mechanochemical removal mechanism at the tribological interface severely restricts the further improvement in the accuracy and efficiency of the GaN planarization during the CMP process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%