2020
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1852555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of two-body wear behavior of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic for biomedical applications; in vitro chewing simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In two-body wear, the wear rate is typically lower, and the wear patterns are predictable. The wear mechanism can be influenced by factors such as load, surface roughness, and material properties [ 87 , 88 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two-body wear, the wear rate is typically lower, and the wear patterns are predictable. The wear mechanism can be influenced by factors such as load, surface roughness, and material properties [ 87 , 88 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advancements in our understanding of chewing simulation testing and wear processes, as well as how they lead to material failures in the real oral environment, were emphasized in recent research. Additionally, the properties of chewing simulators capable of simulating the intraoral tribological mechanism in a laboratory context have been examined [122][123][124]. The impact of temper-ature on the visco-elastic characteristics of composite resins was investigated.…”
Section: Effects Of Wear Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yilmaz used a three-dimensional profilometer to evaluate the mean volume loss and depth of the surface of the specimen after tooth wear to investigate the two-body wear mechanism between teeth and dental materials [ 55 ]. The accurate quantification of the mean total volume of the wear surface is a prerequisite for informing the professional about the wear performance [ 56 ].…”
Section: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%