2018
DOI: 10.5539/jel.v8n1p87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Relationship Between Psychological Capital Perception, Psychological Well-Being and Job Satisfaction of Teachers

Abstract: The aim of this research is to determine the relationship between psychological capital, psychological well-being and job satisfaction of teachers. The research is a descriptive study in relational screening model. The research model includes three variables; one independent variable (psychological capital) and other two dependent variables (job satisfaction and psychological well-being). In the structural model, job satisfaction variable may also be expressed as mediator variable. The study population consist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
12
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of PsyCap on flourishing was positive, indicating that the availability of high levels of efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience in teaching is related to experiencing high levels of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. This finding seems to align with recent research focused on teacher well-being [ 31 , 32 ], underlining the significant contribution of PsyCap as a personal resource that enhances the lives of teachers, not only in terms of satisfaction, pleasure, and enjoyment, but also as a means of attaining high levels of personal excellence, as other studies have concluded [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. In addition, the positive effect of PsyCap on flourishing would confirm, along the lines laid out by the JD-R model [ 39 ], the significant contribution made by personal resources to well-being in occupational settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of PsyCap on flourishing was positive, indicating that the availability of high levels of efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience in teaching is related to experiencing high levels of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. This finding seems to align with recent research focused on teacher well-being [ 31 , 32 ], underlining the significant contribution of PsyCap as a personal resource that enhances the lives of teachers, not only in terms of satisfaction, pleasure, and enjoyment, but also as a means of attaining high levels of personal excellence, as other studies have concluded [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. In addition, the positive effect of PsyCap on flourishing would confirm, along the lines laid out by the JD-R model [ 39 ], the significant contribution made by personal resources to well-being in occupational settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In a longitudinal study with university teachers, Li [ 36 ] found that PsyCap was a long-term predictor (both directly and indirectly, via meaning in life) of psychological well-being, which is self-acceptance, positive relationships with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. Kurt and Demirbolat [ 37 ] concluded that PsyCap directly, and indirectly (via job satisfaction), improved eudaimonic well-being in secondary-school teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chinese high education context, this result is inconsistency with the previous findings by Kurt and Demirbolat (2019), who got the result, is that psychological capital of teachers in Turkey is moderate level and four dimensions of psychological capital are all medium levels. Additionally, Shen et al (2014) revealed that Chinese university teacher to have a moderate level of psychological capital in the capital of Liaoning province in Northeast China.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Öğretmenlerin sırasıyla en yüksek umut ve öz-yeterlik; en az düzeyde ise iyimserlik ve psikolojik dayanıklık algısına sahip oldukları bulunmuştur. Bu bulgu (Abbas vd., 2012;Avey vd., 2009;Bahadır, 2018;Bergheim vd., 2013;Büyükgöze & Kavak, 2017;Çakmak & Arabacı, 2017;İşçimen, 2019;Kabasin, 2019;Kelekçi, 2015;Kurt & Demirbolat, 2018;Ocak vd., 2016;Töremen & Demir, 2016;Tösten & Özgan, 2017) araştırma bulguları ile paralellik göstermektedir. Araştırma sonuçlarından farklı olarak öğretmenlerin en yüksek öz-yeterlik ve psikolojik dayanıklık, en az ise iyimserlik puan ortalamasına sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir (Altınkurt vd., 2015).…”
Section: Tartışma Ve Sonuçunclassified