2012
DOI: 10.1002/app.36455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the nanocellular foaming of polystyrene in supercritical CO2 by adding a CO2‐philic perfluorinated block copolymer

Abstract: Nanocellular foaming of polystyrene (PS) and a polystyrene copolymer (PS‐b‐PFDA) with fluorinated block (1,1,2,2‐tetrahydroperfluorodecyl acrylate block, PFDA) was studied in supercritical CO2 (scCO2) via a one‐step foaming batch process. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP) was used to synthesize all the polymers. Neat PS and PS‐b‐PFDA copolymer samples were produced by extrusion and solid thick plaques were shaped in a hot‐press, and then subsequently foamed in a single‐step foaming process using scCO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results corroborate the nucleation efficiency values presented in Figure , which show a sudden increase for particles larger than 40 nm when the contact angle for nucleation is low, that is, for the particles with a PDMS shell, whereas for the bare silica particles, there is a more steady increase of the nucleation efficiency. Interesting to mention here is that CO 2 -philic block copolymer-based heterogeneous phases are considered as promising nucleation agents, as well. ,, In fact, Rodriguez-Perez and co-workers reported a nucleation efficiency close to unity for poly­(methyl methacrylate)- co -poly­(butyl acrylate)- co -poly­(methyl methacrylate) block copolymer (BCP) domains in PMMA. This high nucleation efficiency could be explained by the fact that depending on the nucleation point in the phase-separated morphologies of the BCPs, these block copolymer domains do not experience a line tension.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results corroborate the nucleation efficiency values presented in Figure , which show a sudden increase for particles larger than 40 nm when the contact angle for nucleation is low, that is, for the particles with a PDMS shell, whereas for the bare silica particles, there is a more steady increase of the nucleation efficiency. Interesting to mention here is that CO 2 -philic block copolymer-based heterogeneous phases are considered as promising nucleation agents, as well. ,, In fact, Rodriguez-Perez and co-workers reported a nucleation efficiency close to unity for poly­(methyl methacrylate)- co -poly­(butyl acrylate)- co -poly­(methyl methacrylate) block copolymer (BCP) domains in PMMA. This high nucleation efficiency could be explained by the fact that depending on the nucleation point in the phase-separated morphologies of the BCPs, these block copolymer domains do not experience a line tension.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers with a higher maximum CO 2 solubility theoretically induce smaller pore morphologies at easier processing conditions (lower pressure). Other methods, such as the addition of polar fluorine atoms, also enhance solubility in microporous foams, but currently do not make an appearance in their nanoporous counterparts with the exception of their addition into block‐copolymers …”
Section: Structure–property Relationships Of Nanoporous Foamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods, such as the addition of polar fluorine atoms, also enhance solubility in microporous foams, but currently do not make an appearance in their nanoporous counterparts with the exception of their addition into block-copolymers. [42,43] In situations, such as PET, where both phenyl rings and carbonyls are present, the susceptibility to assume that an increase in solubility would occur comes easily. Unfortunately, the crystallizability of PET significantly reduces the overall solubility and negates the benefits of both interactions, which negates this assumption.…”
Section: Effect Of Co 2 Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, five kinds of polymers could be employed to prepare nanocellular foam: amorphous polymer, 8 acrylic copolymer, 15 block copolymer with a high CO 2 -philic nano-sized dispersed phase segments, 16 polymer blend-containing nano-templates, 17 and polymer composites. 18 Amorphous polymers with an extremely large viscoelasticity could significantly restrict cell growth and coalescence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%