2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the crack front process zone in the Double Cantilever Beam test with backface strain monitoring technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each test has several objectives: to overcome the shortcomings of others (parasite stress, edge effects), to introduce new load types (single mode or mixed modes), to test thin films or complete bonded structures, etc. [7][8][9], with the view of obtaining a criterion which allows the adhesion to be defined. This determination can be carried out in two ways: by initiating an adhesive failure or by propagating adhesive failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each test has several objectives: to overcome the shortcomings of others (parasite stress, edge effects), to introduce new load types (single mode or mixed modes), to test thin films or complete bonded structures, etc. [7][8][9], with the view of obtaining a criterion which allows the adhesion to be defined. This determination can be carried out in two ways: by initiating an adhesive failure or by propagating adhesive failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a protocol previously described [33], an instrumented DCB test was performed under constant specimen opening rate using a universal tensile testing machine (Zwick=Roell Z010, Zwick GmbH & Co., Ulm, Germany). The results of this test, with constant 0.3 mm=min crosshead speed, will be referred to as monotonic.…”
Section: Dcb Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14,15]) and changes the dynamic properties significantly, and therefore has a major influence on the lifetime of the structure. The delamination behavior of composite materials is characterized by different specimens for mode-I [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], mode-II [24][25][26], mixed-mode I/II [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], mode-III [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], mixed-mode I/III [49] mixed-mode II/III [42,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] and mixed-mode I/II/III [60][61]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%