2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of structural, optical and micro-mechanical properties of (NdyTi1−y)Ox thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar behavior has been already observed for even small addition of ca. 10 at.% of Nd2O3 to TiO2 thin films [33]. In the case of TiO2, XRD measurements revealed a trace amount of fine crystallites related to the rutile phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar behavior has been already observed for even small addition of ca. 10 at.% of Nd2O3 to TiO2 thin films [33]. In the case of TiO2, XRD measurements revealed a trace amount of fine crystallites related to the rutile phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In turn, the packing density (PD) of a film is defined as the ratio of the average film density (ρf) and the bulk density (ρb) according to the equation [33,40,41]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties in the traditional testing are calculated from the depth of the penetrated material at the maximum indentation load of each loading cycle (Figure 9a), while in the CSM method, the hardness and elastic modulus can be obtained as a function of indentation depth [35] (Figure 9b). In our previous work [56], it was mentioned that unlike the quasi-static traditional indentation experiments, the CSM method is considered to be dynamic testing, which may matter in the case of time-dependent material behaviour. The CSM method gives the possibility to obtain mechanical properties (i.e., hardness and Young's elastic modulus values) as a function of the indentation depth.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [56], it was mentioned that unlike the quasi-static traditional indentation experiments, the CSM method is considered to be dynamic testing, which may matter in the case of time-dependent material behaviour. The CSM method gives the possibility to obtain mechanical properties (i.e., hardness and Young's elastic modulus values) as a function of the indentation depth.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the processing conditions, materials can be obtained with specific mechanical, magnetic and optical properties, microstructures, and surface textures. For example, Gan et al [21] investigated the structural properties of Cu2O-epitaxial films, Sun et al [22] determined the optical and electrical performance of thermochromic V2O3 thin films, Cao and Zhou [23,24] determined the magnetic properties of CoZrNb and FeNiCr films, Mirzaee et al [25] examined the surface textures of ZnO films, Rode et al [26] studied effects of deposition rate on surface roughness of Al films, Zenkin et al [27] investigated the thickness dependence of wettability and surface properties of HfO2 thin films, Han et al [28] explored the composition and structure of TiHxHe films, Gudla et al [29] investigated the microstructure evolution of AlZr and AlZrSi coatings during heat treatment processes, Kobata and Miura [30] examined the mechanical and thermal properties of TiCuZrNiHfSi thin films, Pshyk et al [31] analyzed the structural, morphological and tribo-mechanical properties of AlNTiB2TiSi2 coatings, and Mazur et al [32] investigated structural, optical, and micro-mechanical properties of (NdyTi1−y)Ox thin films produced by magnetron sputtering. Moreover, effects of the magnetron sputtering processing on the surface roughness of ultra-thin films are investigated in different studies [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%