2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2014.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of spectrochemical matrix effects in the liquid sampling-atmospheric pressure glow discharge source

Abstract: The liquid sampling-atmospheric pressure glow discharge (LS-APGD) microplasma was evaluated with regards to its spectrochemical robustness in its application as a miniaturized optical emission spectroscopy (OES) source for liquid samples. The susceptibility to perturbations in excitation/ionization conditions was probed across a wide range test species, including transition metals, easily ionized elements (group I), and elements with low second ionization potentials (group II). Spectrochemical metrics included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 366 active LEP power is comparable to other solution-based microplasmas, for example, the SCGD 367 and the LS-APGD. Typical operating powers for the SCGD and LS-APGD are in the range of 368 60-80 W [35][36][37] and < 50 W [27,38], respectively. 369…”
Section: Optimization Of Off-time Interval Between Successive Discharge Pulses For Stable Pulse-295 To-pulse Discharge Current 296mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 366 active LEP power is comparable to other solution-based microplasmas, for example, the SCGD 367 and the LS-APGD. Typical operating powers for the SCGD and LS-APGD are in the range of 368 60-80 W [35][36][37] and < 50 W [27,38], respectively. 369…”
Section: Optimization Of Off-time Interval Between Successive Discharge Pulses For Stable Pulse-295 To-pulse Discharge Current 296mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the LS-APGD physical set-up can be easily modied to meet the needs for analyzing different aggregation states (liquid, solid), and for gaining elemental, isotopic, and/or molecular information by coupling the source either to an optical emission or mass spectrometer. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Here, the LS-APGD microplasma source was sustained between the electrolytic test solution (500 mg g À1 Cu and Zn in 2% HNO 3 (both single element standards CPI International, Santa Rosa, CA, USA)) and a hollow stainless steel counter electrode (316 SS, 1.2 mm i.d., 1.6 mm o.d., IDEX Health and Science, Oak Harbor, WA, USA). The use of such high test solution concentrations, versus previously determined single-mg mL À1 detection limits, 14 allows reasonable emission response levels under non-ideal conditions across the parameter space.…”
Section: Ls-apgd Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25,37,40,41 Previous works with the LS-APGD-OES source have yielded fairly low Mg II : Mg I ratios of $1, but perhaps surprisingly showing a good deal of immunity towards additions of easily ionized elements (EIEs) and laser ablation-generated aerosols. 12,13,21 While the above-cited Mg line pair is very convenient to implement, ion : atom transitions of other elements have been employed. Of relevance here, Chan et al 42 and Chan and Hieje 24 have used the Zn II : Zn I (206.2 nm : 213.9 nm) pair for investigating ICP matrix effects, with values for this ratio occurring in the general range of 0.9-1.0.…”
Section: Inuence Of Excitation Conditions On Plasma Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations