2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3015282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Semi-Rigid Coaxial Test Probes as RF Injection Devices for Immunity Tests at PCB Level

Abstract: This work investigates the performance of RF immunity procedures exploiting semi-rigid coaxial test probes as coupling devices to inject continuous wave (CW) RF power into the outlets of Integrated Circuits (ICs). Two solutions are presented, both offering the advantage with respect to the traditional direct power injection method, to run the test without removing the IC from its actual PCB. The first procedure resorts to near-field coupling to inject the noise into an interconnecting trace. The second procedu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the effect of perturbation exerted by the presence of the probe on the transmission characteristics of the trace under test should be taken into account. However, previous investigations [9] carried out by measurement and simulation on injection setups involving electric-field probes proved that, as long as the trace under test is covered by the solder mask (non-contact test in [9]), the probe exerts a negligible effect on signal propagation on the trace under test (i.e., the test is not intrusive). Hence, this effect can be neglected.…”
Section: A Model Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretically, the effect of perturbation exerted by the presence of the probe on the transmission characteristics of the trace under test should be taken into account. However, previous investigations [9] carried out by measurement and simulation on injection setups involving electric-field probes proved that, as long as the trace under test is covered by the solder mask (non-contact test in [9]), the probe exerts a negligible effect on signal propagation on the trace under test (i.e., the test is not intrusive). Hence, this effect can be neglected.…”
Section: A Model Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exemplify the procedure of identification of the parameters of the behavioral model, an electric near-field probe, realized by a semi-rigid cable RG405 11.75 mm long and terminated in a 1 mm tip (hereinafter referred to as "probe RG405") is considered. The definition of probe performance parameters for immunity tests and their experimental investigation for probe RG405 can be found in [9].…”
Section: B Parameters Of the Behavioral Model For The Reference Struc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with traditional radiated susceptibility tests or direct radiofrequency power injection method [8], nearfield tests not only are available for module-and PCBlevel testing but can also provide detailed information on weak components and/or noise propagation paths [9]- [12]. Indeed, near-field probes can be used to detect EMsensitive areas at IC [6], [13] and PCB [14], [15] levels. Furthermore, by properly placing probes on IC pins/nets, one can evaluate the EM-immunity performance of specific electronic components [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, near-field probes can be used to detect EMsensitive areas at IC [6], [13] and PCB [14], [15] levels. Furthermore, by properly placing probes on IC pins/nets, one can evaluate the EM-immunity performance of specific electronic components [15], [16]. Therefore, it is of great importance to investigate the performance of different near-field probes and the corresponding test setups to ascertain their suitability for immunity analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%