2005
DOI: 10.1007/11423270_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Rule Interestingness in Medical Data Mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our and other researchers' surveys [1][2][3]5] show that interestingness measures can be categorized with the several factors in Table 1. The subject to evaluate rules, a computer or human user, is the most important categorization factor.…”
Section: Conventional Rule Interestingness Measuresmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of our and other researchers' surveys [1][2][3]5] show that interestingness measures can be categorized with the several factors in Table 1. The subject to evaluate rules, a computer or human user, is the most important categorization factor.…”
Section: Conventional Rule Interestingness Measuresmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In addition, they may offer a human user unexpected new viewpoints. Although the validity of objective measures has been theoretically proven and/or experimentally discussed using some benchmark data [1][2][3], very few attempts have been made to investigate their comparative performance and the relation between them and real human interest for a real application [5]. Our investigation will be novel in this light.…”
Section: Conventional Rule Interestingness Measuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But, in the literature, they seek to find a correlation between real human interest and objective interestingness measures [5,[37][38][39]. BM_IRIL also proposes a new feature weighting technique that takes benefit maximization issues into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%