2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30116-5_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Rule Interestingness Measures with a Clinical Dataset on Hepatitis

Abstract: Abstract. This research empirically investigates the performance of conventional rule interestingness measures and discusses their practicality for supporting KDD through human-system interaction in medical domain. We compared the evaluation results by a medical expert and those by selected measures for the rules discovered from a dataset on hepatitis. Recall, Jaccard, Kappa, CST, χ 2 -M, and Peculiarity demonstrated the highest performance, and many measures showed a complementary trend under our experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have taken 39 objective rule evaluation indexes to select mined rules [10], visualizing and sorting them depended on users' interest. Although these two procedures are passive support from a viewpoint of the system, we have also identified active system reaction with prediction of user evaluation based on objective rule evaluation indexes and human evaluations.…”
Section: A Procedures To Mine Time-series Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have taken 39 objective rule evaluation indexes to select mined rules [10], visualizing and sorting them depended on users' interest. Although these two procedures are passive support from a viewpoint of the system, we have also identified active system reaction with prediction of user evaluation based on objective rule evaluation indexes and human evaluations.…”
Section: A Procedures To Mine Time-series Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, in the literature, they seek to find a correlation between real human interest and objective interestingness measures [5,[37][38][39]. BM_IRIL also proposes a new feature weighting technique that takes benefit maximization issues into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, they are strongly domain-dependent and user-dependent. To avoid these drawbacks, the literature has proposed more than 40 data-driven rule interestingness measures [5], [7], [3]. These measures estimate the degree of interestingness of a rule to the user in a userindependent, domain-independent fashion, and so are much more generic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of works on data-driven rule interestingness measures ignore this question because they do not even show the rules to the user. A notable exception is the interesting work of [5], which investigates the effectiveness of approximately 40 data-driven rule interestingness measures, by comparing their values with the subjective values of the user's interest -what they called real human interest. Measuring real human interest involves showing the rules to the user and ask her/him to assign a subjective interestingness score to each rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation