2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-017-1259-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of novel oligoelectrolyte polymer carriers for their capacity of DNA delivery into plant cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to smaller size and surface effect of starch nanoparticles, the DNA-nanoparticle complex (pEGAD plasmid DNA-PLL-StNP) was protected from DNase I cleavage (Jun et al, 2008). Similarly, dimethylaminoethyl metacrylate (DMAEM) based cationic polymers protect DNA against cleavage by DNAse I due to repulsion of Mg 2+ ions by amino groups and hindrance of accessibility of enzymes to DNA (Finiuk et al, 2017). Further, endosomal escape and cytosolic stability were reported by MSNP (Hussain et al, 2013) in which MSNP functionalized with TEG remained stable in endocytotic vesicles in cytoplasm and CNT (Burlaka et al, 2015).…”
Section: Merits Of Nanoparticles Meditaed Transformation Over Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to smaller size and surface effect of starch nanoparticles, the DNA-nanoparticle complex (pEGAD plasmid DNA-PLL-StNP) was protected from DNase I cleavage (Jun et al, 2008). Similarly, dimethylaminoethyl metacrylate (DMAEM) based cationic polymers protect DNA against cleavage by DNAse I due to repulsion of Mg 2+ ions by amino groups and hindrance of accessibility of enzymes to DNA (Finiuk et al, 2017). Further, endosomal escape and cytosolic stability were reported by MSNP (Hussain et al, 2013) in which MSNP functionalized with TEG remained stable in endocytotic vesicles in cytoplasm and CNT (Burlaka et al, 2015).…”
Section: Merits Of Nanoparticles Meditaed Transformation Over Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hussain et al (2013) witnessed the uptake of MSN by wheat root during post germination in MS liquid medium solution and lupin roots in hydroponic system and did not cause any toxic effect and nanoparticles were found to be internalized near and within the cell wall of wheat root and xylem of lupin roots. Finiuk et al (2017) studied genotoxic and cytotoxic properties of polymer PDMAEM based nanoparticles in meristem cells of Allium cepa roots and protoplasts of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) based on miotic index and number of viable protoplasts. It was observed that cationic polymers TN 84/5 was least cytotoxic, even at extreme concentration of polymer (5×10 -2 ).…”
Section: Merits Of Nanoparticles Meditaed Transformation Over Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dsRNA and dendrimer polyplexes were able to penetrate through the root wall into the plant cells, leading to a significant reduction in shoot apical meristem size and increased lateral roots. In another report, 111 a number of dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA)-based cationic polymers (Figure 7a) were evaluated for plasmid DNA binding capacity, protection against nuclease degradation, and transfection efficiency to Ceratodon purpureus moss as well as Nicotiana tabacum protoplasts. However, in general, the exploration of functional polymers in this area is at a very preliminary stage and requires significantly more research focus.…”
Section: Other Applications: Inside Plants Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanotechnology-based methods have been used to deliver biomolecules and chemicals into cells in both plant and mammalian cell systems (Chang et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Mahakham et al, 2017;Fortuni et al, 2019); however, compared with the mammalian cell delivery process, NP-mediated plant biomolecule delivery has proven to be more challenging because of the presence of the natural barrier provided by the cell wall (Mao et al, 2019). It has been suggested that the use of NPs enables an efficient plant transformation because NPs protect the genetic cargo from cellular enzymatic degradation (e.g., nucleases; Finiuk et al, 2017;Joldersma and Liu, 2018 (Bates and Kostarelos, 2013;Karimi et al, 2015), but metallic NPs can only deliver DNA as genetic cargo (Zhao et al, 2017). In addition, silicon-based NPs can carry DNA and proteins, whereas polymeric NPs (e.g., PEG and polyethyleneimine) can transfer encapsulated RNA, DNA, and proteins into cells (Silva et al, 2010;Moon et al, 2011;Su et al, 2011;Hasanzadeh Kafshgari et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2018).…”
Section: Advanced Plant Biomolecule Delivery Approaches Via the Application Of Nanobiotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%