2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of mechanical properties of concrete with natural aggregates partially replaced by recycled coarse aggregate (RCA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M. C. Shah used RCA instead of NCA to prepare recycled concrete with a gradient of 7%, 14%, 21%, and 28% and studied the mechanical properties of recycled concrete. It was found that the mechanical properties of recycled concrete could still meet the design requirements [19]. Ruaa Yousif Hassan used RCA to replace NCA at 100%, and RFA to replace RS with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% replacement rates to prepare recycled self-compacting concrete with different mix ratios and study its mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. C. Shah used RCA instead of NCA to prepare recycled concrete with a gradient of 7%, 14%, 21%, and 28% and studied the mechanical properties of recycled concrete. It was found that the mechanical properties of recycled concrete could still meet the design requirements [19]. Ruaa Yousif Hassan used RCA to replace NCA at 100%, and RFA to replace RS with 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% replacement rates to prepare recycled self-compacting concrete with different mix ratios and study its mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] As a result, the workability, mechanical properties, and durability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) are inferior to the natural aggregate concrete (NAC). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] From mesoscopic view, at the same mix proportion, RAC will contain more types and numbers of interfacial transition zone (ITZ) than ordinary concrete. 14 Previous studies have also confirmed that the ITZ is always the weakest point in the concrete 15 ; therefore, compared with NAC under the same mixtures, RAC has more defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%