2018
DOI: 10.1107/s2052520618003736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of interactions in Lewis pairs between phosphines and boranes by analyzing crystal structures from the Cambridge Structural Database

Abstract: The interactions between phosphines and boranes in crystal structures have been investigated by analyzing data from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). The interactions between phosphines and boranes were classified into three types; two types depend on groups on the boron atom, whereas the third one involves frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs). The data enabled geometric parameters in structures to be compared with phosphine-borane FLPs with classical Lewis pairs. Most of the crystal structures (78.1%) contain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deviations of the B–H bond length of about 0.05 Å were reported, however, for terminal atoms, was about 0.1 Å [20]. Investigations based on CSD data mining, e.g., [21], are inevitably based on partially biased data, and the authors highlight the inaccuracy in hydrogen atom positions. By contrast, Crabtree et al, in 1996, used normalized B–H and N–H bond distances to avoid systematic underestimation of the bond lengths in the CSD structures [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations of the B–H bond length of about 0.05 Å were reported, however, for terminal atoms, was about 0.1 Å [20]. Investigations based on CSD data mining, e.g., [21], are inevitably based on partially biased data, and the authors highlight the inaccuracy in hydrogen atom positions. By contrast, Crabtree et al, in 1996, used normalized B–H and N–H bond distances to avoid systematic underestimation of the bond lengths in the CSD structures [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By conducting a structural databases survey, significant insights into molecular structure and interactions can be achieved (Milovanović et al, 2018;Janjić et al, 2013;Sredojević et al, 2012;Groom et al, 2016;Majerz & Dziembowska, 2018;Grothe et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pdb Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%