2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2021.121944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pnictogen effects on the electronic interactions in the Lewis pair complexes Ph3EB(C6F5)3 (E = P, As, Sb)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FLP-type structure B­(C 6 F 4 ) 3 CF···P t Bu 3 is only 26 kJ mol –1 higher in energy than the DA complex B­(C 6 F 4 ) 3 CF·P t Bu 3 and may be stabilized by interatomic contacts F···H of 2.18 Å. Similar stabilization via interaction between H atoms of phenyl and F atoms of C 6 F 5 groups was recently noted for the B­(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ·EPh 3 complexes (E = As, Sb) by Ketkov et al Dissociation enthalpy of 25 kJ mol –1 and reorganization energies of the fragments (2.9 and 5.4 kJ mol –1 ) for B­(C 6 F 4 ) 3 CF···P t Bu 3 are slightly larger compared to those for B­(C 6 Me 4 ) 3 CH···P t Bu 3 . The entropy factor dissociation of these two weakly bound systems into components at 298 K is exergonic by 25–28 kJ mol –1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The FLP-type structure B­(C 6 F 4 ) 3 CF···P t Bu 3 is only 26 kJ mol –1 higher in energy than the DA complex B­(C 6 F 4 ) 3 CF·P t Bu 3 and may be stabilized by interatomic contacts F···H of 2.18 Å. Similar stabilization via interaction between H atoms of phenyl and F atoms of C 6 F 5 groups was recently noted for the B­(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ·EPh 3 complexes (E = As, Sb) by Ketkov et al Dissociation enthalpy of 25 kJ mol –1 and reorganization energies of the fragments (2.9 and 5.4 kJ mol –1 ) for B­(C 6 F 4 ) 3 CF···P t Bu 3 are slightly larger compared to those for B­(C 6 Me 4 ) 3 CH···P t Bu 3 . The entropy factor dissociation of these two weakly bound systems into components at 298 K is exergonic by 25–28 kJ mol –1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…[68b] Thus, in contrast to recent Lewis acid/base repulsion model, proposed by Radius and Finze on the basis of the percent of buried volume, [73] specific interactions between bulky substituents may increase the dissociation energy of the complex. [67] We conclude, that reorganization energies of group 13 metal Lewis acids are 10-43 kJ mol À 1 , while they are significantly larger for the boron -containing Lewis acids (64-126 kJ mol À 1 ), which masks potentially high Lewis acidity of boron-containing LA. Group 14 element Lewis acids: Structural changes of group 14 element tetrahalides upon complex formation are much more diverse due to possibility of existence of several isomers for coordination numbers 5 and 6 (Scheme 7).…”
Section: Energetic Characteristics Of Da Complexes Importance Of the ...mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…More recently, Ketkov et al [67] pointed out, that in case of complexes bearing bulky terminal groups both on LA and LB, such as complexes B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 • EPh 3 (E = P, As, Sb), noncovalent interactions between terminal groups can provide the additional stabilization of the DA complex. In this case, the computed E DA value according to Equation ( 2) is not only the DA bond energy of the interacting central atoms of LA and LB, but has also a sizable contribution from the attractive interactions between bulky terminal groups.…”
Section: Energetic Characteristics Of Da Complexes Importance Of the ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A class of reversible and dynamic noncovalent bonds that involve donor–acceptor interactions are Lewis pairs, in which the Lewis acid (LA) accepts an electron lone pair from the Lewis base (LB) to form a dative bond. , A distinctive feature of Lewis adducts is that the binding energy of the dative bond is tunable by electronic and steric modifications of the LA or the LB. , In a classic Lewis adduct involving boron trihydride and ammonia, the bond dissociation energy is estimated as 31 kcal/mol, which is approximately a third of the bond dissociation energy needed for a carbon–carbon single bond . Therefore, it is possible to tailor specific bond energies in Lewis adduct macromolecular systems to tune the properties of materials for specific applications such as sensors, gas storage, or catalysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%