2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-019-01365-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Hydrodynamic Dispersion and Intra-pore Turbulence Effects in Porous Media

Abstract: The aim of the present paper is to evaluate and compare the pore level hydrodynamic dispersion and effects of turbulence during flow in porous media. In order to compute these quantities, large eddy simulations of turbulent flow in five unit cells comprised of spherical particles are performed and the results are averaged over the cells. Visualizations of vortical structures reveal that the size of the turbulence structures is of the size of the pores. Investigations furthermore yield that volume-averaged valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous flow may be more effective than oscillating flow in driving advective pore water exchange in permeable sediments. In contrast to the steady pressure gradients continuous flows generate, wave orbital motion produces oscillating gradients, which enhance turbulence in the pore space of the sand (Horton and Pokrajac, 2009;Jouybari et al, 2020). This turbulence and inertial losses associated with the acceleration and deceleration of the pore flows may lessen the effects of pressure gradients driving the advective pore flows and interfacial water exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous flow may be more effective than oscillating flow in driving advective pore water exchange in permeable sediments. In contrast to the steady pressure gradients continuous flows generate, wave orbital motion produces oscillating gradients, which enhance turbulence in the pore space of the sand (Horton and Pokrajac, 2009;Jouybari et al, 2020). This turbulence and inertial losses associated with the acceleration and deceleration of the pore flows may lessen the effects of pressure gradients driving the advective pore flows and interfacial water exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b) is in line with rates reported for reef lagoon sediments in Moorea (P max 6.8 ± 0.5 mmol m −2 h −1 ; Boucher et al, 1998), New Caledonia (P max ∼ 10 mmol m −2 h −1 ; Clavier and Garrigue, 1999), and the Great Barrier Reef (P max ∼ 11 mmol m −2 h −1 ; Eyre et al, 2013). To put these rates into perspective, eddy covariance flux measurements over dense Mediterranean Posidonia seagrass meadows (13 m depth, PAR 300-400 µmol photons m −2 s −1 ) revealed daytime O 2 fluxes of 6.8 ± 0.7 mmol m −2 h −1 and nighttime fluxes of −3.6 ± 0.4 mmol m −2 h −1 (Koopmans et al, 2020), i.e. rates of the same magnitude as measured in the microphytobenthos communities.…”
Section: O 2 Fluxes In Permeable Carbonate Reef Sandsmentioning
confidence: 99%