2021
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-5381-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technical note: Novel triple O<sub>2</sub> sensor aquatic eddy covariance instrument with improved time shift correction reveals central role of microphytobenthos for carbon cycling in coral reef sands

Abstract: Abstract. The aquatic eddy covariance technique stands out as a powerful method for benthic O2 flux measurements in shelf environments because it integrates effects of naturally varying drivers of the flux such as current flow and light. In conventional eddy covariance instruments, the time shift caused by spatial separation of the measuring locations of flow and O2 concentration can produce substantial flux errors that are difficult to correct. We here introduce a triple O2 sensor eddy covariance instrument (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the autonomous system we developed, a P-I curve was constructed on a scatterplot of 122 points, with 8 replicates for each light intensity. Contrary to the method of measuring fluorescence (Morelle et al, 2018) or eddy covariance (Merikhi et al, 2021) which are techniques that do not take depth into account, to our knowledge, no study on microphytobenthos using microsensor technique has allowed the construction of a P-I curve with such a high number of values. This was made possible by the synchronization and automation of the different elements composing the autonomous system.…”
Section: A B Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the autonomous system we developed, a P-I curve was constructed on a scatterplot of 122 points, with 8 replicates for each light intensity. Contrary to the method of measuring fluorescence (Morelle et al, 2018) or eddy covariance (Merikhi et al, 2021) which are techniques that do not take depth into account, to our knowledge, no study on microphytobenthos using microsensor technique has allowed the construction of a P-I curve with such a high number of values. This was made possible by the synchronization and automation of the different elements composing the autonomous system.…”
Section: A B Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FACT sensor operates with an analyte sensing volume for conductivity and fluorescence that is displaced from the physical structure of the probe tip, and thus can be made to overlap with the velocity sensing volume without interfering with velocity measurements. This closer overlap between sensing volumes avoids the need for time shift corrections due to sensing volume displacement, as well as uncertainties that increase as the horizontal velocity direction departs from a downstream sensor orientation [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, the aquatic eddy covariance (AEC) technique (Berg et al 2003) has improved the quality of benthic O 2 flux measurements for many ecosystems, including seagrass meadows (Lee et al 2017; Berger et al 2020; Koopmans et al 2020), oyster and mussel reefs (Attard et al 2019 b ; Volaric et al 2020), macroalgal and Maerl beds (Attard et al 2019 a ; Polsenaere et al 2021), permeable sands (Chipman et al 2016; Merikhi et al 2021), freshwater systems (McGinnis et al 2008; Koopmans and Berg 2015), and coral reefs (Long et al 2013; de Froe et al 2019). It has also recently been used for upside‐down measurements of gas exchange at the air–water interface (Berg and Pace 2017; Long and Nicholson 2018; Berg et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofouling of both fiberoptodes and microelectrodes can cause erroneous signals (Huettel et al 2020), and collisions with debris can lead to signal spikes, sensor defects and data loss (Koopmans et al 2020(Koopmans et al , 2021. To increase robustness and thus, deployment success, some studies use multiple microelectrodes or fiber-optic optodes (Attard et al 2014(Attard et al , 2019bMerikhi et al 2021). An alternative to these sensing systems is the microplanar optode sensor, which is more robust because of its larger tip (8 mm diameter) that does not break and is rarely affected by floating debris (Berg et al 2016;Amo-Seco et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%