2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13112428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Fibers Reinforced Engineered Cementitious Composites Properties Using Quartz Powder

Abstract: In relation to the use of retrofit materials on damaged constructions, application on earthquake-resistant buildings, and for the strengthening and rehabilitation on weakened regions, there is a need for a more superior material than concrete. Application sites include beam-column joints, corbels, link-slabs, deep beams, support regions and dapped-end areas. Fiber reinforced engineered cementitious composites (FR-ECC) can address this issue, because FR-ECC is one of the composite materials that has high streng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 28 days, the corrosion coefficient of UCS of samples PFB21 and PFB22 is maintained at about 0.97, which has no obvious difference from the strength of unsoaked concrete. With the increase of basalt fiber content, the erosion coefficient of UCS of the PFB group shows a smooth state or slightly increases; this indicates that, with the increase of fiber content, the improvement of sulfate attack resistance of the PFB group is small, and the deterioration effect is not obvious; this is similar to the results of Liew et al [36]. In the control group, the corrosion coefficient of UCS of C1 and C2 concrete at 7 or 28 days is between 0.75-0.8, which is significantly lower than that of unsoaked concrete; however, the corrosion resistance coefficient of UCS of the PFB group is between 0.8-0.97, which is about 5-15% higher than that of the control group; this indicates that the addition of basalt fiber and biochar can effectively resist sulfate attack.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resistance To Sulfate Attacksupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 28 days, the corrosion coefficient of UCS of samples PFB21 and PFB22 is maintained at about 0.97, which has no obvious difference from the strength of unsoaked concrete. With the increase of basalt fiber content, the erosion coefficient of UCS of the PFB group shows a smooth state or slightly increases; this indicates that, with the increase of fiber content, the improvement of sulfate attack resistance of the PFB group is small, and the deterioration effect is not obvious; this is similar to the results of Liew et al [36]. In the control group, the corrosion coefficient of UCS of C1 and C2 concrete at 7 or 28 days is between 0.75-0.8, which is significantly lower than that of unsoaked concrete; however, the corrosion resistance coefficient of UCS of the PFB group is between 0.8-0.97, which is about 5-15% higher than that of the control group; this indicates that the addition of basalt fiber and biochar can effectively resist sulfate attack.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resistance To Sulfate Attacksupporting
confidence: 85%
“…At 28 days, the corrosion coefficient of UCS of samples PFB21 and PFB22 is maintained at about 0.97, which has no obvious difference from the strength of unsoaked concrete. With the increase of basalt fiber content, the erosion coefficient of UCS of the PFB group shows a smooth state or slightly increases; this indicates that, with the increase of fiber content, the improvement of sulfate attack resistance of the PFB group is small, and the deterioration effect is not obvious; this is similar to the results of Liew et al [36].…”
Section: Analysis Of Resistance To Sulfate Attacksupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Studies related to the use of UHPFRC layers as a strengthening material have been also reported by others (Prem et al , 2015; Zhang et al , 2020; Paschalis and Lampropoulos, 2021; Zhu et al , 2020). Furthermore, many researchers have carried out investigations into the mechanical properties, behaviour and durability of UHPFRC (Abbas et al , 2015; Alkaysi et al , 2016; Spiesz and Hunger, 2017; Tayeh et al , 2012; Wille et al , 2014; Zhang et al , 2020; Liew et al , 2020). This will certainly provide invaluable information for the construction sector related to the use of UHPFRC as strengthening or rehabilitation materials on damaged-RC elements.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make later ECC more cost-effective in terms of building expenditures by enabling it to be cast and mixed like concrete generally [4,5]. On the other hand, the addition of nanomaterials such graphene oxide [6][7][8], quartz powder [9] and nano-silica [3,10,11] is a form of modification in the development of ECC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%