2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of fatigue crack propagation behavior of 5083 aluminum alloy under various stress ratios: Role of grain boundary and Schmid factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six particles were tested and measured in this way, and their results are listed in Table 1, giving an average interface strength of 254 ± 61 MPa. This value is much larger than the critical resolved shear stress for Pillar B of ~95 MPa, calculated using an average Schmid factor of 0.3 for face-centered cubic Al [42]. In fact, all individual measurements are much larger than this critical resolved shear stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Six particles were tested and measured in this way, and their results are listed in Table 1, giving an average interface strength of 254 ± 61 MPa. This value is much larger than the critical resolved shear stress for Pillar B of ~95 MPa, calculated using an average Schmid factor of 0.3 for face-centered cubic Al [42]. In fact, all individual measurements are much larger than this critical resolved shear stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This was attributed to the fact that the high Schmid factor represented the grain soft orientation, which was benefit for the crack initiation and propagation. However, the low Schmid factor hindered the crack growth, indicating that the grains showed the hard orientation 37 . Connolley et al 38 indicated that significant propagations were confined to just a few SCs in each sample, and showed that the initial da/dN of some propagation SCs were roughly in the same level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the low Schmid factor hindered the crack growth, indicating that the grains showed the hard orientation. 37 Connolley et al 38 indicated that significant propagations were confined to just a few SCs in each sample, and showed that the initial da/dN of some propagation SCs were roughly in the same level. Hence, it was assumed that the initial da/dN of SC 2 and SC 4 were rough the same.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Multi-scs Propagation and The Division Of Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the previous two-driving-force models above cannot work for negative R; thus, a modified twodriving-force model was proposed to accommodate a wide range of R, 10,19,23 as expressed in Equation (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%