“…For example, when Re = 9000, ε max = 2.9, 1.6, 1.4, and 0.5 for the absorbers investigated, respectively, by Chamoli et al [51], Kumar and Layek [28], Chauhan and Thakur [50], and Gawande et al [27]. Finally, it is worth mentioning that some modeling works, also developed during the last decade for different roughness types, were not analyzed herein, mainly because the experimental setup deviates considerably from the typical configuration of a rectangular duct with a single rough surface: Skullong and Promvonge [30] used triangle-shaped winglets to enhance the roughness of a collector having two absorber plates; Tamna et al [32] investigated the effect of multiple thin V-shaped ribs attached to the absorber surfaces of a double-absorber collector; Skullong et al [31] investigated the effect of absorbers with multiple V-shaped ribs, interspersed with straight grooves, oriented perpendicular to the flow direction, in a double-absorber collector; Acır et al [33] investigated round-duct collectors containing inner ring-shaped plates with holes, perpendicular to the flow direction, to increase the turbulence of the air stream; Kumar et al [35] studied the effect of straight ribs, perpendicular to the flow direction, attached to the absorber of a collector made of a triangle-shaped cross-section duct.…”