Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2014) 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0534-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Cutting Edge Radius Effect in Macro-machining and Micro-machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5.b) shows clearly the existence of the negative rake angle and the relative bluntness of the tool, which plays an important role in increasing the specific cutting forces (Saedon et al, 2016;Vogler et al, 2002;Shaw, 1995). (Saedon et al, 2016) The minimum chip thickness hmin is specified as the critical value that to be comparable to minimum uncut chip thickness, which removed from a work surface at a cutting edge. In macro machining, in general, the depth of cut is greater than the cutting tool edge radius, and the removed chip from the work surface generates by cutting tool.…”
Section: Size Effect and Concept Of Removed Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5.b) shows clearly the existence of the negative rake angle and the relative bluntness of the tool, which plays an important role in increasing the specific cutting forces (Saedon et al, 2016;Vogler et al, 2002;Shaw, 1995). (Saedon et al, 2016) The minimum chip thickness hmin is specified as the critical value that to be comparable to minimum uncut chip thickness, which removed from a work surface at a cutting edge. In macro machining, in general, the depth of cut is greater than the cutting tool edge radius, and the removed chip from the work surface generates by cutting tool.…”
Section: Size Effect and Concept Of Removed Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it can be said when the ratio of the depth of cut to tool edge radius less than 1, so the chip cannot be formed and material cannot be deformed (Schmitz et al, 2002;Furukawa and Moronuki, 1988;Lucca et al, 1991;Aramcharoen and Maivenga, 2009;Ucun et al, 2010;Ucun et al, 2013). (Saedon et al, 2016).…”
Section: Size Effect and Concept Of Removed Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations