2005
DOI: 10.3358/shokueishi.46.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Coxiella burnetii Contamination in Commercial Milk and PCR Method for the Detection of C. burnetii in Egg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest detection limit in these studies was between 1 and 10 3 particles per milliliter in bovine milk [2,6,10,22] Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes [1], Staphylococcus aureus [24], Brucella spp. [25] and Corynebacterium casei [17] have been found in dairy products by direct detection using PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lowest detection limit in these studies was between 1 and 10 3 particles per milliliter in bovine milk [2,6,10,22] Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes [1], Staphylococcus aureus [24], Brucella spp. [25] and Corynebacterium casei [17] have been found in dairy products by direct detection using PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Japan, 131 of 244 (53.7%) commercial milk samples tested by nested PCR were positive for C. burnetii [10]. Moreover, 14.3% of bovine milk samples tested by real-time PCR were positive for C. burnetii in Italy [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The percentage of bovine milk samples testing positive in this study (41%; 95%CI: 20-62%), falls within the range of recent studies in Italy (27-60%) (Petruzzelli et al 2013;Vicari et al 2013), which used a touchdown PCR targeting the same IS1111 transposon-like repetitive region of the commercial kit used here. Investigations in other countries showed, however, quite variable positivity percentages, ranging from 83.8% in France (Guatteo et al 2007) to 66.7% in Hungary (Gyuranecz et al 2012), 57.1% in the United States (Loftis et al 2010), 53.7% in Japan (Hirai et al 2005) and 6.2% in Iran (Rahimi et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results of investigation into this issue remain scarce, and there are reports of the PCR-based detection of Q-fever Coxiella DNA in dead bacterial fragments, but there are no reports demonstrating contamination with the viable bacteria. 39 However, sterilization of raw milk at 63°C for 30 min or more, which meets the sterilization condition for Q-fever Coxiella, is performed in Japan, as it is in the United States, and therefore no problem is expected regarding food contamination.…”
Section: Q Fever and Food Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%