1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-727x(99)00043-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of cavitation in real size diesel injection nozzles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
80
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…the ratio of forces that support versus those that suppress cavitation. Critical cavitation numbers (or incipient cavitation numbers) based on this definition have been found to fall in the range of 0.5 to 10, with associated critical Reynolds numbers of between 5,000 and 30,000 [2,3,9,13,15,18].…”
Section: Cavitation Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the ratio of forces that support versus those that suppress cavitation. Critical cavitation numbers (or incipient cavitation numbers) based on this definition have been found to fall in the range of 0.5 to 10, with associated critical Reynolds numbers of between 5,000 and 30,000 [2,3,9,13,15,18].…”
Section: Cavitation Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies have focused on cavitation imaging in optical models of Diesel nozzles, typically enlarged 20, with few studies on real-size nozzles [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Moreover, only limited work can be found on quantitative flow data in scaled-up or real Diesel and gasoline injectors, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, cavitation has been found to develop inside fuel injection nozzles at the early studies of Badock et al (1999), Bergwerk (1959), Chaves et al (1995) and Nurick (1976), followed by Arcoumanis et al (2000), Blessing et al (2003), Mitroglou et al (2014) and Roth et al (2002) in more realistic real-size nozzle geometries offering optical access; equally helpful studies performed in transparent enlarged nozzle replicas [selectively (Andriotis et al 2008;Arcoumanis et al 2000;Miranda et al 2003; Mitroglou and Gavaises 2013;Powell et al 2000)] also indicate that cavitation plays an increasingly significant role in the nozzle's internal flow structure and development. Cavitation inside an injection hole is believed to enhance spray atomisation, either directly through the implosion of cavitation bubbles or indirectly because it increases turbulence in the nozzle flow (Badock et al 1999;Walther 2002); unfortunately, under certain circumstances induces erosion (Dular and Petkovšek 2015;Koukouvinis et al 2016) that may lead to catastrophic failures. Moreover, cavitation inside the injection holes promotes shot-toshot spray instabilities (Mitroglou et al 2011(Mitroglou et al , 2012Suh and Lee 2008), which, in turn, are responsible for poor combustion efficiency and increased emissions (Hayashi et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain the atomization characteristics due to the cavitation in the nozzle flow, the visualization of the cavitation need to perform by the flow visualization system, and atomization characteristics such as Sauter mean diameter (SMD) and droplet mean velocity is determined by using a particle analyzer system [16]- [18]. The pictures of the light sheet experiment taken with a CCD camera were compared with photographs taken by the shadowgraph technique under the same injection conditions [19]- [21]. As a result the cavitation films could be observed as thin objects which do not extend into the internal flow of the injection nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%