2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/coginfocom.2012.6421937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the use of Non-verbal Cues in Human-Robot Interaction with a Nao robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, a number of studies revealed that hand gestures improve user perceptions of robots on scales such as likability, and competence, and future contact intentions (e.g. [2][3] [4]). A possible explanation for this finding is that humanoid robots engender humanlike behavioural expectations in people they interact with, thus, when these expectations are met, the interaction is viewed more positively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a number of studies revealed that hand gestures improve user perceptions of robots on scales such as likability, and competence, and future contact intentions (e.g. [2][3] [4]). A possible explanation for this finding is that humanoid robots engender humanlike behavioural expectations in people they interact with, thus, when these expectations are met, the interaction is viewed more positively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we summarise the different methods and technologies that we studied for the Nao WikiTalk. The studies and experiments are discussed in more detail in [8].…”
Section: Face Detection Tactile Sensors and Non-verbal Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is no answer, Nao stops and waits. More details about using non-verbal cues in human-robot interaction are given in [4].…”
Section: Implementation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hand recognition was too much dependent on the lighting and background, so in practise we did not include it in the interaction repertoire, but used tapping on the robot's head instead. See [4] for a review of the experiments on hand recognition.…”
Section: Gesturing and Presentation Of Newinfomentioning
confidence: 99%