2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the role of psychological contract breach on career success: Convergent evidence from two longitudinal studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…After PCB they will often reduce their commitment or contribute less to the business in terms of in-role or extrarole efforts to restore fairness to the exchange relationship (Turnley et al, 2003). Researchers have consistently indicated that PCB negatively affects the attitudes of employees toward their organization, including attitudes such as affective commitment (Bunderson, 2001;Gakovic & Tetrick, 2003;Lester et al, 2002;Raja et al, 2004;Rousseau, 1995;Shore & Barksdale, 1998;Zhao, Wayne, Glibkowski, & Bravo, 2007), job satisfaction (Lester et al, 2002;Robinson, 1996;Robinson & Rousseau, 1994;Tekleab, Bartol, & Liu, 2005;Zhao et al, 2007), organizational citizenship behavior (Restubog, Bordia, & Bordia, 2011;Robinson, 1996), and performance (Lester et al, 2002;Robinson, 1996). Researchers have also suggested that PCB increases emotional exhaustion (Johnson & O'Leary-Kelly, 2003), mistrust (Zhao et al, 2007) and levels of neglect (Turnley & Feldman, 2000), in addition to negatively affecting employee behavior (Kickul & Lester, 2001;Robinson & Morrison, 1995).…”
Section: Consequences Of Psychological Contract Breachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After PCB they will often reduce their commitment or contribute less to the business in terms of in-role or extrarole efforts to restore fairness to the exchange relationship (Turnley et al, 2003). Researchers have consistently indicated that PCB negatively affects the attitudes of employees toward their organization, including attitudes such as affective commitment (Bunderson, 2001;Gakovic & Tetrick, 2003;Lester et al, 2002;Raja et al, 2004;Rousseau, 1995;Shore & Barksdale, 1998;Zhao, Wayne, Glibkowski, & Bravo, 2007), job satisfaction (Lester et al, 2002;Robinson, 1996;Robinson & Rousseau, 1994;Tekleab, Bartol, & Liu, 2005;Zhao et al, 2007), organizational citizenship behavior (Restubog, Bordia, & Bordia, 2011;Robinson, 1996), and performance (Lester et al, 2002;Robinson, 1996). Researchers have also suggested that PCB increases emotional exhaustion (Johnson & O'Leary-Kelly, 2003), mistrust (Zhao et al, 2007) and levels of neglect (Turnley & Feldman, 2000), in addition to negatively affecting employee behavior (Kickul & Lester, 2001;Robinson & Morrison, 1995).…”
Section: Consequences Of Psychological Contract Breachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each type of PCB leads to various outcomes (Restubog et al, 2011;Zagenczyk, Gibney, Few, & Scott, 2011). In this study, we adapted the composite measure to examine the impact of each type of psychological contract on turnover intention.…”
Section: Consequences Of Psychological Contract Breachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, Professional Commitment is the commitment under the viewpoint of self-agreement, stressing on the higher commitment of an individual to the affective attachment and agreement with a certain profession (Gentry et al 2012). Since Professional Commitment is based on such professional value and affective agreement, it also agrees with what the members do in the profession (Komarraju et al 2011) and involves in affective investment which presents positive correlations with job satisfaction and citizenship behaviors (Restubog et al 2011), but negative effects on employee turnover intention and positive effects on employee participation intention (Sadeghi and Pihie 2012). Professional Commitment is generated when an employee perceives positive correlations between professional norms or professional obligation and job satisfaction (Venkataramani et al 2010), which appears to have negative effects on employee turnover intention and positive effects on employee participation intention (Zhang et al 2012).…”
Section: Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es decir ¿qué espacios se reserva la organización para evaluar el talento y las expectativas de sus colaboradores? (Restubog, Bordia y Bordia, 2011). ¿Se tiene en cuenta el talento en las políticas de RRHH?…”
Section: Un Nuevo Espacio De Interacción: El Contrato Psicológicounclassified